Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Open questions

Contribute Evidence

One question, and what would settle it.

What do the disconnected letters at the head of certain suras signify?

Why it is open. Fourteen of the twenty-eight Arabic letters, exactly half the alphabet, appear disjoined at the opening of a number of suras. The classical commentary tradition records a wide range of proposals for what they do and returns no agreed answer, and one position long held within that tradition is that the meaning was not disclosed. Modern scholarship has added further proposals without producing a consensus either. This is not a case of two camps disagreeing; it is a case in which no reading has been established.

What would resolve it. Nothing in the manuscript record settles the meaning, and it may not be settleable. What would narrow it is evidence that bears on the openings as written objects rather than as a puzzle: systematic collation of the earliest codices for whether and how the letters are set off, and a distributional study relating the sets of letters to the suras that carry them.

Field. Quranic studies, Arabic philology and early Islamic manuscript palaeography

What you are proposing, or the evidence itself. Be as specific as the question is.
The question says what would resolve it. Say how what you are sending satisfies that. This is the field an editor reads first.
A link anybody can follow to check it. A stable one if there is a choice: a permalink, a DOI, a repository record.
The full citation, so it can be quoted properly and found again if the link dies.

Who To Credit

How you want to be named if this is used. It is not shown anywhere until an editor accepts the evidence.
Optional.
Optional. If you have one, it makes the credit unambiguous.

Two Things To Agree

Back To The List