Back to A Different Lens

The atlas's own record for the Gemstones type separates two different claims: stones were certainly worn, carved and credited with virtues in antiquity, lapidary texts listing their properties running from Pliny to the medieval lapidaries to Ayurvedic and Chinese sources, and this category records those traditional attributions rather than making claims about physical effects. Counted by type, Gemstones is nonetheless the atlas's fifth most argued with type: 24.7 percent of its recorded facts are debated or debunked, against a baseline of well under one percent.

One Finding, Repeated Almost Everywhere in the Type

Nearly every gemstone in the type carries the identical finding in the atlas's own words: the practice is routinely presented as an ancient or a universal one, and it is neither. Stones were certainly worn, carved and credited with virtues in antiquity, but the specific modern framework, cleansing and charging, programming with intention, chakra correspondence, crystal grids, and the Atlantean and Lemurian back story that goes with it, appears in the twentieth century and can be watched appearing. Diamond carries this finding, and so does Ruby, manikya, the stone of Surya, and so do more than three dozen others across the type, from Amethyst to Turquoise. None of this makes the practice illegitimate as a practice; it makes the claim of ancient provenance false, and the atlas's own record says so in identical language on stone after stone rather than varying the finding by name.

One Stone Borrows a Different Kind of Authority

Clear Quartz carries an additional, different finding the rest of the type does not. Quartz is piezoelectric, and a plate cut to a precise orientation resonates at a very stable frequency, which is why quartz keeps time in a watch; it converts mechanical stress to charge in measurable quantities. It does not store information: a resonator is not a memory device, and the crystals in watches and computers are grown synthetically because natural quartz is too variable for the purpose. The claim that a crystal can hold or transmit intention borrows the vocabulary of a real, documented physical property for an effect that property does not produce, the same borrowing of scientific vocabulary this atlas's own Frequencies essay names in tones marketed for healing. Two different kinds of false provenance inside one type: most of Gemstones claims a history it does not have, and one stone within it claims a physics it does not have either.

Where To Read More

• GemstonesThe type itself, 24.7 percent debated or debunked, the atlas's fifth most argued with type
• DiamondCarries the type's identical repeated finding on ancient provenance
• RubyAlso carries the identical repeated finding on ancient provenance
• AmethystNamed as one of more than three dozen stones carrying the same finding
• TurquoiseNamed as one of more than three dozen stones carrying the same finding
• Clear QuartzCarries an additional, different debunked finding about piezoelectric memory claims