Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Asz ࡑ

Mandaic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin The script took shape between the second and the seventh century CE

Asz is the eighteenth letter of the Mandaic alphabet and writes an emphatic s, the counterpart of sadhe in the other Aramaic alphabets. It joins on both sides. Its name is spelled with sz in the modern character standard to keep it apart from as, the fifteenth letter, in a naming scheme that has to work in plain Latin letters with no diacritics at all. With the affrication mark beneath it the letter carries a further sound from outside the inherited set, one of the several the mark supplies. It joins on both sides and takes a full set of four shapes. Eighteenth place is the one sadhe holds in the inherited Aramaic order, which the Mandaic sequence follows without alteration as far as the twenty-second sign.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
The script took shape between the second and the seventh century CE 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Place of Origin
Lower Mesopotamia, among the Mandaean communities of southern Iraq and south-western Iran 3Tradition: The Mandaic script
Origin of the Name
Most letter names are formed from the letter's own sound with a preceding a, and do not continue the Northwest Semitic nouns that stand behind the Hebrew and Syriac names 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Sense of the Name
No name-sense is attested for Mandaic Asz: like most of the alphabet it is named by its own sound with the vowel a placed in front, not by an inherited Northwest Semitic word as Hebrew and Syriac letter names are, so Asz denotes a pronunciation rather than carrying a separate meaning of its own. 1
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Mandaean texts are transmitted in manuscripts copied by priestly scribes, whose colophons record the chain of copyists standing behind each copy 3Tradition: Mandaean scribal transmission
Practice
Liturgical and Scriptural Role
Classical Mandaic, written in this script, is the liturgical language of the Mandaean religion; the community is small and now largely in diaspora, and its priestly knowledge is not open material 3Tradition: Mandaeism
Disputed
A Rival System's Attribution
The script's ancestry is assigned either to a cursive form of Aramaic, the derivation favored by most script historians, or to the Parthian chancery script used in Sasanian era administrative documents. 4Tradition: The Mandaic script
Both derivations are held in the literature and neither has displaced the other. The Aramaic cursive camp points to the letterforms' overall resemblance to other late Aramaic cursive scripts of the region, including Nabataean and Syriac; the Parthian chancery camp points to specific letterforms, including certain medial and final forms, that resemble Pahlavi documentary hands more closely than any Aramaic cursive exemplar. No single find has settled the question, and Mandaic paleography treats it as open pending further comparative work.
Identity
Script Type
A true alphabet rather than an abjad: halqa, ushenna and aksa are full letters for the vowels a, u and i, where the related Semitic scripts write consonants and point the vowels 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Position
Eighteenth of the twenty-two inherited letters 2Tradition: The Mandaic script
How the Letter Joins
Joins on both sides, taking initial, medial, final and isolated shapes 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Attributions
Associated Sound
Emphatic s, the counterpart of sadhe in the other Aramaic alphabets 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The alphabet is called the abagada after its opening letters, and the traditional count of twenty-four is reached by adding the digraph adu and then writing the first letter again at the end 2Tradition: The Mandaic alphabet
Meaning in the Attesting Source
With the affrication mark written beneath it the letter stands for a further sibilant value from outside the inherited set 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Learn More
Asz: The Mandaic Letter

Asz is the eighteenth letter of the Mandaic alphabet and writes an emphatic s, the counterpart of sadhe in the other Aramaic alphabets. It joins on both sides and takes a full set of four shapes.

Its name is spelled with sz in the modern character standard to keep it apart from as, the fifteenth letter, in a naming scheme that has to work in plain Latin letters with no diacritics at all. Nothing in Mandaic corresponds to the z, and the spelling says nothing about how the letter sounds.

With the affrication mark beneath it the letter carries a further sound from outside the inherited set, one of the several the mark supplies.

Eighteenth place is the one sadhe holds in the inherited Aramaic order, which the Mandaic sequence follows without alteration as far as the twenty-second sign. In Hebrew, Syriac and the Arabic abjad reckoning the letter at that place carries the numeral value ninety and closes the run of tens. Mandaic records no numeral use for its letters, so the eighteenth place here marks nothing but a position in the sequence and a sound in the language.

Because asz joins on both sides it takes initial, medial, final and isolated shapes and keeps a connected run going. Its counterpart in Syriac, sadhe, joins only to the right. The same place in the same inherited sequence is therefore filled by letters that behave differently in the two scripts, which is a reminder that joining behaviour was settled by each script on its own and is not part of the inheritance.

Asz and the Emphatic Consonants

Semitic languages characteristically pair a plain consonant with an emphatic one, articulated further back in the mouth, and treat the two as separate sounds that distinguish words. The inherited alphabet gives each member of the pair its own letter, and Mandaic keeps them: asz beside as, att beside at, and aq at the nineteenth place.

What exactly emphasis consisted of in the older languages is described differently in different accounts, since the evidence is spellings and later reading traditions rather than recordings, and the modern languages that keep the contrast do not all keep it the same way. In Mandaic the letters are kept apart in writing, and the spoken language has narrowed some of the distinctions, as it has narrowed the gutturals.

The naming scheme makes this harder to see than it should be. Asz and as differ by a letter that stands for nothing; att and at differ by a doubled t that has nothing to do with length. Both spellings exist to keep names apart in a scheme without diacritics, and a reader who takes them as descriptions of the sounds will be misled in both cases.

The pairs also sit far apart in the sequence, at fifteen and eighteen, at nine and twenty-two. The inherited order does not group related consonants, which is one of the things that makes it look arbitrary and makes its survival across four alphabets meaningful.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Related To

Mandaic Asz and Syriac Sadhe hold the same place in the twenty-two letter Aramaic sequence both alphabets inherited. The shapes are unrelated to look at, so it is the order that carries the descent. Where the Mandaic shapes came from is disputed, a cursive Aramaic hand or the Parthian chancery script.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Mandaic Asz and Hebrew Tzaddi occupy the same place in the twenty-two letter Aramaic sequence. Hebrew keeps the inherited noun as the letter name and the numeral value 90; Mandaic keeps neither. Where the Mandaic shapes came from is disputed, a cursive Aramaic hand or the Parthian chancery script.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. The Mandaeans: Ancient Texts and Modern People
Jorunn Jacobsen Buckley, Oxford University Press, 2002View the Source
4. Iranian Scripts for Aramaic Languages: The Origin of the Mandaic Script
Charles G. Haberl, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 341, pp. 53 to 62, 2006View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.