Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Final Mem ם

final MEM
Also Known As Final Mem
Hebrew Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

ם
Origin Develops the Achaemenid Aramaic chancery hand, adopted after the exile

Final Mem is the word-final (sofit) form of the letter Mem, written as a closed square shape and used whenever Mem falls at the end of a word. In the standard gematria of the final letters it carries the extended value of six hundred. It shares the meaning of its parent letter, water, and the same Hermetic attributions: the element Water, the tarot trump The Hanged Man, and the twenty-third path of the Tree of Life. Its sealed, closed form (as against the open form of ordinary Mem) is the subject of much mystical commentary as an image of the hidden and completed, and the five final forms together carry the hundreds from five hundred to nine hundred in gematria.

Facts
Disputed
Origin Period
Scholem places Sefer Yetzirah between the second and sixth century CE 4Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters
Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others.
Origin Period
Survives in three recensions that do not agree in detail 4Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters
Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others.
Attributions
Associated Sound
Same sound as its parent letter Mem, the bilabial nasal m 1
Origins
Origin Period
Develops the Achaemenid Aramaic chancery hand, adopted after the exile 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Origin Period
Not the script of the earliest Hebrew inscriptions 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Origin Period
Standard by the Hasmonean period; palaeo-Hebrew survives only on coins 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Place of Origin
The Levant, by way of the Aramaic administrative script of the Persian empire. 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Origin of the Name
Names travelled into Greek unchanged and meaningless 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Origin of the Name
Northwest Semitic words inherited from the older linear script 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Origin of the Name
Pictographic meanings (ox head, house, water) are modern reconstructions 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
Sense of the Name
water 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script
The pictographic sense is a modern reconstruction from the letter name rather than a meaning attested in the script's own period, and the atlas records that position elsewhere on this letter. The name itself is inherited; the picture behind it is inferred.
Identity
Script Type
An abjad: the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew square script record consonants, read right to left, with vowels supplied either by the reading tradition or, in pointed texts, by the Masoretic vowel-pointing system. 1
Position
Second of the five Hebrew sofit final forms, the word-final form of Mem (thirteenth of twenty-two), extending the gematria series to six hundred 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Says nothing of the five word-final forms; not separate letters 2Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Sefer Yetzirah knows twenty-two letters: mothers, doubles, simples 2Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters
Meaning in the Attesting Source
This class is inherited from its base letter, not the text's own assignment 2Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters
Rival Systems
A Rival System's Attribution
Most gematria claims use the standard value, not mispar gadol 3Tradition: Standard Hebrew gematria (mispar hechrachi)
A Rival System's Attribution
Standard value (mispar hechrachi): 40, same as its base letter 3Tradition: Standard Hebrew gematria (mispar hechrachi)
A Rival System's Attribution
This atlas records 600, the mispar gadol extended reckoning 3Tradition: Standard Hebrew gematria (mispar hechrachi)
Learn More
Final Mem: The Final Form of Mem (Value 600)

Final Mem (mem sofit) is the word-final, fully closed form of the mother letter Mem, as against the open medial mem. This pair of open and closed forms drew unusual mystical attention: the Talmud (Shabbat 104a) treats the two shapes as divinely given, and famously the word 'lemarbeh' in Isaiah 9:6 contains a closed final mem in the middle of a word, an anomaly on which Kabbalists and the Zohar built teachings about hidden and revealed redemption. In standard gematria Final Mem equals Mem (40); in mispar gadol it takes the value 600. It inherits the mother letter Mem's element (Water) rather than a separate correspondence.

The five final forms are a detail the Sefer Yetzirah itself is silent on: the text as it survives knows twenty-two letters, three mothers, seven doubles and twelve simples, and says nothing about separate word-final shapes, so Final Mem's classification is inherited wholesale from Mem rather than being the text's own assignment. That base text is itself hard to date: Gershom Scholem placed its composition somewhere between the second and sixth century CE, and it survives in three recensions that disagree with each other in detail.

The Hebrew script carrying these letterforms is not the script of the earliest Hebrew inscriptions either; it develops the Aramaic chancery hand of the Achaemenid Persian empire, adopted after the Babylonian exile and standard by the Hasmonean period, displacing the older palaeo-Hebrew script, which survives afterward mainly on coins. The letter names are Northwest Semitic words inherited from that older script; their familiar pictographic glosses are modern reconstructions, and the names travelled into Greek unchanged in sound but empty of meaning.

Final Mem: The Sealed Letter

Like the other four sofit letters, Final Mem's distinct shape is credited in the Talmud, at Shabbat 104a, either to the early prophets or to the men of the Great Assembly, a debate the text leaves open rather than settling in favour of either tradition. Final Mem's own shape is a fully closed square, in contrast to the open-topped form of ordinary Mem used everywhere else in a word, discussed elsewhere in this atlas; later Kabbalistic writers took that closure as an image in its own right, speaking of a mem setumah, a sealed mem, as a figure for teachings or future matters held back from open view until their proper time. That reading sits naturally beside Mem's ordinary meaning, water, and its place among the Sefer Yetzirah's three mother letters, discussed elsewhere in this atlas, since a closed vessel of water offered ancient commentators a ready image for something contained rather than flowing freely.

The specific, unrelated anomaly of a closed-style Mem appearing mid-word in Isaiah 9:6, recorded in the Talmud at Sanhedrin 94a, belongs to the history of ordinary Mem rather than to Final Mem's own separate development. In the extended gematria system known as mispar gadol, discussed elsewhere in this atlas, Final Mem carries the value 600, one of five values that extend the ordinary twenty-two-letter numeral count past 400.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Related To

The word-final form of Mem rather than a separate letter. Hebrew writes five of its consonants differently at the end of a word, and the two shapes stand for one and the same letter. The value 600 recorded here is the extended mispar gadol reckoning; in standard gematria the final form counts 40, exactly as Mem does.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996the chapter on the Aramaic scriptView the Source
2. Sepher Yetzirah (Book of Formation)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Abraham)On the letter Mem in the Sefer YetzirahView the Source
3. Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras Wrought
Underwood Dudley, Mathematical Association of America (Spectrum series), 1997the chapter on alphabets for gematriaView the Source
4. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961the chapter on early Jewish mysticism, on Sefer YetzirahView the Source
Sefer Yetzirah: The Book of Creation in Theory and Practice
Aryeh Kaplan, Samuel Weiser, 1997On the Hebrew letters and gematriaView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.