Alphabet Letters
Psa (Pa) ፐ
Ge'ez Letters
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin Descends from the Ancient South Arabian script; the vocalised seven-order form appears on Aksumite inscriptions of the fourth century CE
Psa is the twenty-sixth and last letter of the Ge'ez fidel and writes a plain p. It closes an order that began with the throat consonants and has run through the whole inventory of the classical language, and it is one of the letters whose place at the end suggests a later addition to an order that was already fixed. With psa the classical fidel is complete at twenty-six base consonants, which in seven vowel orders makes one hundred and eighty-two syllable characters, plus the labiovelar series and the letters the modern Ethiopian languages have added since. The atlas records the twenty-six and describes the orders.
Facts
Practice
Liturgical and Scriptural RoleThe script of the Ge'ez liturgy of the Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo churches, where the text is chanted rather than read silently 4Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity Transmission
Manuscript TraditionGe'ez scripture and liturgical books are copied by hand on parchment and bound between wooden boards, a practice that has continued without interruption 3Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity Disputed
Meaning in the Attesting SourceWhy the script was vocalised in the fourth century CE, after centuries of writing consonants alone, is argued and not settled 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) reviews the Aksumite inscriptions that first show Ge'ez written with vocalisation, a fourth-century CE innovation that is not in dispute, and canvasses three explanations for why it happened then: an internal development inside the Aksumite royal chancery seeking a more precise script for administration; a response to the newly Christian court's need for scripture translated and taught with unambiguous vowels after Aksum's conversion under King Ezana; and influence carried by vocalised Indian scripts reaching the Aksumite court through Red Sea trade contact. Comparing the timing, the epigraphic evidence and the trade record for each explanation, the volume's contributors find none conclusive, since Aksum's fourth-century contacts touched all three at once; the dating of the change is settled, its cause is not. Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceGe'ez numbers are written with a separate set of twenty numeral characters, so no numeral value attaches to a letter and the script has no counterpart to Hebrew gematria or the Arabic abjad reckoning 5Tradition: The Ge'ez script Meaning in the Attesting SourceWritten in seven orders, ge'ez, ka'eb, salis, rabi', hamis, sadis and sabi', which carry the seven vowels of the classical language; the first order is the citation form and the others modify its shape 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script Open Questions
Historical OriginPsa writes a plain p, a sound Ge'ez did not inherit, so the letter must be an addition to an already-fixed order. Two explanations circulate, that it is the Greek pi taken over with Greek vocabulary, and that it is a modification of an existing fidel sign; neither rests on a document.
Both readings of psa's origin are readings of the letterform and of its position at the end of the order rather than of any documented act; no dated Aksumite or post-Aksumite inscription showing the earliest forms of psa and payt against the Ancient South Arabian signary and Greek letterforms has settled which explanation holds. Sense of the NameNot established for this letter's own name inside the Ge'ez tradition
Psa's own description names no cognate and states no sense, and notes the letter's place at the very end of the order as a mark of a likely later addition to an already-fixed sequence. Identity
Script TypeAn abugida: each base consonant is written in seven vowel orders and is never written without a vowel of its own, which sets the script apart from the consonantal abjads of the rest of the Semitic family 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script PositionTwenty-sixth of twenty-six in the halehame order, the traditional order of the fidel, which is not the inherited Semitic order 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script How the Letter JoinsThe letters do not join, and the script runs left to right, unlike every other Semitic script of comparable age 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script Attributions
Associated Soundp 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script Origins
Origin PeriodDescends from the Ancient South Arabian script; the vocalised seven-order form appears on Aksumite inscriptions of the fourth century CE 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script Place of OriginThe kingdom of Aksum, in the northern highlands of what are now Ethiopia and Eritrea 2Tradition: The Ge'ez script Origin of the NameThe Ge'ez letter names are traditional names carried with the script; some are recognisably the inherited Semitic words and others are not, and the relation of the set as a whole to the Northwest Semitic names is only partly recoverable 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script Use
Ritual UseRead, chanted and copied in the Ethiopian and Eritrean churches, and used for the religious texts of the Ethiopian Jewish tradition 3Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity Learn More
Psa, the Last Letter, and a Question About Where It Came From
Psa writes a plain p and closes the Ge'ez order at twenty-six. Like payt before it, it answers to no Semitic consonant: the inherited p had become f, and the two p letters exist because the language later needed to write a sound it had lost.
The usual explanation for this letter is that it is the Greek pi, taken over along with the Greek vocabulary and names that made it necessary. The explanation is plausible and it is not documented. It rests on a resemblance between two letterforms and on the plain fact that the words needing a p were Greek. A rival account keeps the letter inside the script, making it a modification of an existing fidel sign in the same way payt is usually said to be a modification of tayt. Nothing in the Aksumite record decides between them.
The atlas records the relation to the Greek pi as debated rather than attested, and carries an open question stating what would settle it: dated Aksumite inscriptions showing the earliest forms of both p letters, read against the South Arabian signary, by someone working in Ethiopian epigraphy. That is a real research programme rather than a rhetorical gesture, and the material for it is in the ground and in the museums of Tigray and Eritrea.
The Rarest Letter in the Fidel
Psa is the least used of the twenty-six. In classical Ge'ez it appears chiefly in loanwords and in a small number of names, and a reader can work through a good deal of liturgical text without meeting it. Payt, the other p letter, is commoner, because the names it spells, Pawlos and Petros among them, are constantly in the lectionary.
Rarity of that kind is worth recording rather than glossing over, and it has a practical consequence: a letter that a scribe writes rarely is a letter whose form varies more from hand to hand, and it is one of the first places a palaeographer looks when dating or localising a manuscript. The letters a script uses least often are frequently the ones that carry the most information about who wrote it and when.
The modern languages have changed the balance. Amharic and Tigrinya take loanwords with p from European languages freely, and the letter is now ordinary in a newspaper where it was a curiosity in a psalter. That is a reminder that the fidel is a working script and not a closed classical inventory. The atlas records the twenty-six letters of the classical Ge'ez alphabet, which is a defined thing with a fixed membership, and the wider Ethiopic script that has grown from it is a larger subject with its own history still in progress.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
Why this is disputed. The Ge'ez letter psa is commonly explained as the Greek pi, taken over along with the Greek loanwords and proper names that needed a plain p sound Ge'ez's native inventory did not otherwise mark clearly. Ethiopic script specialists broadly accept the Greek source for this letter specifically, unlike most of the native Ge'ez order, but disagree on whether it entered through direct Greek literary contact in Aksum or through Coptic Christian texts that had already adapted Greek letters themselves, one step removed from Greek rather than direct.
Related To
Psa and payt are the two p letters of the fidel, both standing at the end of the order and both writing a sound the Semitic inheritance did not supply. Payt writes the ejective and psa the plain stop.
Sources
Open Questions (2 open questions)
Do the Ge'ez letter names carry a sense inside Ge'ez, or are they inherited forms only?
A few Ge'ez letter names are transparently words in the language: bet is a house, gaml is a camel, and the word behind res is the word for a head. Most are not, and several, nahas among them, resemble Ge'ez words closely enough to invite a gloss that nothing supports. The atlas records no meaning for those letters, which is a statement about the evidence and leaves open whether the Ethiopian tradition itself ever attached senses to them.
What would resolve this A survey of the Ge'ez grammatical and church-school literature for any indigenous account of the letter names, set against the comparative reconstruction of the Northwest Semitic names, would show whether an Ethiopian gloss tradition exists and what it says.
Ethiopian philology and the history of the traditional church schoolsDivinity Atlas Open Questions Register, First Edition
Where does the Ge'ez letter psa come from?
Psa writes a plain p, a sound Ge'ez did not inherit, because the Semitic p had become f in this branch. The letter therefore has to be an addition to an order that was already fixed, and two explanations circulate: that it is the Greek pi, borrowed with the Greek names and vocabulary that made a p letter necessary, and that it is a modification of an existing fidel sign. Both are readings of the letterform and of its position at the end of the order. Neither rests on a document.
What would resolve this Dated Aksumite and post-Aksumite inscriptions and manuscripts showing the earliest forms of psa and payt, read against the Ancient South Arabian signary and against Greek letterforms in use in Aksum, would show whether the sign entered the script from outside or was built inside it.
Ethiopian epigraphy and Semitic palaeographyPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), The World's Writing Systems
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.