Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tawe (Ta) ተ

Ge'ez Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Descends from the Ancient South Arabian script; the vocalised seven-order form appears on Aksumite inscriptions of the fourth century CE

Tawe is the tenth letter of the Ge'ez fidel and writes a plain t, distinct from the ejective t of tayt. The same script that carries Ge'ez also carries Amharic, Tigrinya and Tigre, and for those languages it has been extended with further consonants that classical Ge'ez does not use. The atlas records the twenty-six letters of the classical fidel here, because this entry is the Ge'ez alphabet rather than the Ethiopic script at large, and the letters added for the modern languages belong to their own account of it. The seven vowel orders are common to all of them.

Facts
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Ge'ez scripture and liturgical books are copied by hand on parchment and bound between wooden boards, a practice that has continued without interruption 3Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity
Disputed
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Why the script was vocalised in the fourth century CE, after centuries of writing consonants alone, is argued and not settled 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) reviews the Aksumite inscriptions that first show Ge'ez written with vocalisation, a fourth-century CE innovation that is not in dispute, and canvasses three explanations for why it happened then: an internal development inside the Aksumite royal chancery seeking a more precise script for administration; a response to the newly Christian court's need for scripture translated and taught with unambiguous vowels after Aksum's conversion under King Ezana; and influence carried by vocalised Indian scripts reaching the Aksumite court through Red Sea trade contact. Comparing the timing, the epigraphic evidence and the trade record for each explanation, the volume's contributors find none conclusive, since Aksum's fourth-century contacts touched all three at once; the dating of the change is settled, its cause is not.
Attributions
Associated Sound
1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Origins
Origin Period
Descends from the Ancient South Arabian script; the vocalised seven-order form appears on Aksumite inscriptions of the fourth century CE 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Place of Origin
The kingdom of Aksum, in the northern highlands of what are now Ethiopia and Eritrea 2Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Origin of the Name
The Ge'ez letter names are traditional names carried with the script; some are recognisably the inherited Semitic words and others are not, and the relation of the set as a whole to the Northwest Semitic names is only partly recoverable 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Practice
Liturgical and Scriptural Role
The script of the Ge'ez liturgy of the Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo churches, where the text is chanted rather than read silently 4Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity
Open Questions
Sense of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name inside the Ge'ez tradition
Tawe's own description discusses the script's extension for Amharic, Tigrinya and Tigre and states no cognate or sense for its name.
Identity
Script Type
An abugida: each base consonant is written in seven vowel orders and is never written without a vowel of its own, which sets the script apart from the consonantal abjads of the rest of the Semitic family 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Position
Tenth of twenty-six in the halehame order, the traditional order of the fidel, which is not the inherited Semitic order 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
How the Letter Joins
The letters do not join, and the script runs left to right, unlike every other Semitic script of comparable age 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Use
Ritual Use
Read, chanted and copied in the Ethiopian and Eritrean churches, and used for the religious texts of the Ethiopian Jewish tradition 3Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Ge'ez numbers are written with a separate set of twenty numeral characters, so no numeral value attaches to a letter and the script has no counterpart to Hebrew gematria or the Arabic abjad reckoning 5Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Written in seven orders, ge'ez, ka'eb, salis, rabi', hamis, sadis and sabi', which carry the seven vowels of the classical language; the first order is the citation form and the others modify its shape 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Learn More
Tawe, the Plain T, and the Letter Beside It

Tawe writes a plain t and continues the Semitic consonant behind the Hebrew tav, the Syriac taw and the Arabic ta. In the Northwest Semitic order that letter stands last, and the phrase from aleph to tav is the Hebrew equivalent of from A to Z. In the halehame order tawe is tenth, and no such phrase is available, because the order ends elsewhere.

Ge'ez has a second t letter, tayt, which writes the ejective. The pair is inherited: the same distinction exists in Hebrew between tav and tet, in Syriac between taw and teth, and in Arabic between ta and its emphatic counterpart. What differs is how the second member is made. In Ge'ez it is an ejective. In Arabic it is pharyngealised. In Hebrew as read today the two have fallen together and the difference is only orthographic.

So this letter and its partner make a useful test of what a script preserves. All four alphabets kept two signs. Two of the four languages kept two sounds, and they did not keep the same two sounds. A letter is evidence that a distinction once existed, not that it is still made, and reading a fidel chart as a phonetic description of modern Ethiopian speech gets that the wrong way round.

The same caution applies to the vowel orders. Seven orders imply seven vowels, and the classical language is reconstructed with seven, but the values given to them in the received reading tradition are not identical to the reconstructed ones. A chart records a system of contrasts. What a listener hears when the chart is recited aloud is a later settlement of that system, arrived at over centuries.

Tewahedo, and the Word a Church Is Named For

Tewahedo, the word standing in the formal names of both the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church and the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church, begins with this letter. It means being made one, a unity, and it is a doctrinal term. It states the position that the divine and the human in Christ are united in one nature, without separation, confusion or change.

That position is what separated these churches, along with the Coptic, Syriac, Armenian and Malankara churches, from the definition adopted at Chalcedon in 451. The term generally used from outside for the group is miaphysite. The older term monophysite is rejected by the churches themselves as a description of a position they do not hold, and the atlas follows their usage. A church carrying a doctrinal word in its own name is telling anyone who reads the name where it stands.

The word is in Ge'ez rather than in Amharic or Tigrinya because the doctrinal register of these churches is Ge'ez. That is the practical reason a dead language keeps a script alive: the theology is carried in the older vocabulary, and tewahedo does not translate cleanly into the modern languages or into English. The controversy it belongs to is among the longest running in Christian history and is not settled here. The naming is a fact and can be recorded as one.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Related To

Tawe and the Hebrew tav continue the Semitic plain t. Tav closes the Hebrew order, where tawe stands tenth in the Ge'ez one.

Tawe and the Syriac taw continue the Semitic plain t. Taw closes the Syriac order, where tawe stands tenth in the Ge'ez one.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
2. Ancient Churches of Ethiopia: Fourth-Fourteenth Centuries
David W. Phillipson, Yale University Press, 2009
3. Ethiopia and the Bible (The Schweich Lectures 1967)
Edward Ullendorff, Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1968View the Source
4. Ethiopian Christian Liturgical Chant: An Anthology
Kay Kaufman Shelemay and Peter Jeffery, A-R Editions, 1993
5. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
Comparative Dictionary of Ge'ez (Classical Ethiopic)
Wolf Leslau, Otto Harrassowitz, 1987
Open Questions (1 open question)
Do the Ge'ez letter names carry a sense inside Ge'ez, or are they inherited forms only?

A few Ge'ez letter names are transparently words in the language: bet is a house, gaml is a camel, and the word behind res is the word for a head. Most are not, and several, nahas among them, resemble Ge'ez words closely enough to invite a gloss that nothing supports. The atlas records no meaning for those letters, which is a statement about the evidence and leaves open whether the Ethiopian tradition itself ever attached senses to them.

What would resolve this A survey of the Ge'ez grammatical and church-school literature for any indigenous account of the letter names, set against the comparative reconstruction of the Northwest Semitic names, would show whether an Ethiopian gloss tradition exists and what it says.
Ethiopian philology and the history of the traditional church schoolsDivinity Atlas Open Questions Register, First Edition
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.