Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Ja ཇ

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Ja is the seventh of the thirty consonants and the voiced member of the palatal line. Classical Tibetan pronounced it as a voiced affricate, the j of English judge; modern Lhasa speech devoices it to an unaspirated affricate and marks the difference with low tone instead. The letter is one of the three that take the tsa mark to form the affricate series lower in the alphabet, which is why ja and dza share a family resemblance on the page. Like the other voiced letters of the sum cu, ja is a root letter and carries no orthographic duty: it is never a prefix, never a suffix, never stacked above or below another letter.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable ja itself, the voiced member of the palatal line. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Seventh of the thirty consonants, and the voiced member of the palatal line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
A root letter only: it never serves as a prefix, a suffix, a superscript or a subscript 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiced palatal affricate in Classical Tibetan; devoiced with low tone in modern Lhasa speech 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Ja is one of the three letters that take the tsa mark to form the lower affricate series, which is why ja and dza share a family resemblance on the page. 2
Learn More
Ja and the Voiced Palatal

Ja is the seventh of the thirty consonants and the voiced member of the palatal line. In the classical language it was a voiced affricate, the j of English judge. Modern Lhasa speech devoices it to an unaspirated affricate and carries the difference on low tone instead, which is the trade the whole voiced series has made.

Like the other voiced letters of the recitation, ja is a root letter and carries no orthographic office. It is never a prefix, never a suffix, and never stacked above or below another letter.

Its shape has one further job. Ja with the small added mark called the tsa phru is dza, the voiced affricate of the fifth line, in the same way that ca becomes tsa and cha becomes tsha. The family resemblance on the page between ja and dza is therefore not accidental, and once a reader has seen the rule the three affricates cost nothing extra to learn.

In practice ja is met most often at the head of very ordinary words and, in a rather different setting, in the transcription of Indic names, where it stands for the Sanskrit letter of the same value. That second use puts it in the company of the letters that had to be pressed into service when Tibetan became a language of Buddhist translation, and it is one of several places where the alphabet has to do work its designers sized it for deliberately.

Writing Sanskrit in Tibetan Letters

Within a century or two of its creation the Tibetan script had a task it was not shaped for: rendering Sanskrit exactly, in the names, mantras and technical terms of a translated Buddhist canon. Approximation would not do, because a mantra depends on its sounds and a proper name has to be recoverable. So a second apparatus was built beside the thirty letters.

Three devices carry most of it. The retroflex consonants of Sanskrit, which Tibetan does not have, are written as mirror images of the dental letters, so that a reversed ta writes the retroflex, a reversed na writes the retroflex nasal, and so on. The voiced aspirates, likewise absent from Tibetan, are written as the plain voiced letter with a subjoined ha, so that ga with ha beneath it writes the Sanskrit gha. Long vowels, which Tibetan does not distinguish, are written by subjoining the small a beneath the letter, or by doubling the vowel sign.

None of this entered the recitation. A Tibetan child still learns thirty letters and four vowels, and the reversed forms and the rest are taught afterwards as a specialist extension for a specialist purpose.

The result is a script that can hold two languages at different levels of precision, and a page of Tibetan Buddhist writing in which the ordinary text and the transliterated Sanskrit are visibly different in texture.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan ja continues the Brahmi ja, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Derived from This

Dza is the shape of ja carrying the tsa phru. It is the least frequent of the thirty letters in native words and is met most often in the transcription of Sanskrit.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Related To

Ja answers to Brahmi Ja, the same voiced palatal affricate.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Dza's own shape is built on Ja with the same small added mark that gives Tsa and Tsha theirs, per its own description.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.