Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Animals & Totems

Unicorn

Mythical Animals

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 150 to 400 CE

The unicorn of European tradition begins in a mistranslation. Ctesias, a Greek physician at the Persian court around 400 BCE, reported a one-horned wild ass of India; the translators of the Septuagint then rendered the Hebrew re'em, an animal now generally identified as the wild aurochs, by the Greek monokeros, and the Latin Vulgate followed with unicornis, so an ox became a unicorn in several passages of the Christian Bible. The Physiologus of late antiquity supplied the story that only a virgin could capture it, which medieval writers read as an allegory of the incarnation. The Cluny and Cloisters tapestries of around 1500 are the great surviving images. The Chinese qilin and Persian karkadann are separate creatures, not the same animal travelling.

Facts
Disputed
Origin of the Name
The animal is in part a translation artefact. The Hebrew re'em of the Bible is a wild ox; the Greek translators rendered it monokeros, one-horn, and the Latin unicornis, and the creature grew in Europe around the word. 2
The one-horned animal is not solely a translation error: single-horned beasts are reported from India by Greek writers independently of the biblical text, and those reports probably describe the rhinoceros. What the translation supplied was scriptural authority, which is why the unicorn survived in Europe as a real animal for so long, and the identification of re'em as an aurochs or wild ox is the standard modern one.
Origins
Origin Period
150 to 400 CE 1Tradition: Physiologus and the medieval bestiaries
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The Physiologus describes the monoceros as a small and exceedingly fierce beast that no hunter can take, which lies down before a virgin and is caught so. It is not a horse and it is not a gentle creature; the gentleness belongs to the allegory, which is of the Incarnation. 1Tradition: Physiologus and the medieval bestiaries
Identity
Creature Type
Legendary creature, not a species: a single-horned horse-like being that begins in a mistranslation of the Hebrew re'em (the aurochs) through Greek and Latin; the Chinese qilin and Persian karkadann are separate creatures, not the same animal under different names 1
Correspondences
Element Correspondence
Spirit 1
Learn More
An Animal Made by Translation

The unicorn is one of the few mythical creatures whose origin can be traced almost step by step, and the steps are textual rather than mythological.

Ctesias, a Greek physician who spent years at the Persian court and wrote around 400 BCE, describes in his Indica a wild ass of India, white-bodied, with a horn on its forehead, whose horn made into a drinking vessel protects against poison. Ctesias never went to India and was relaying report; the animal behind the description is most plausibly the Indian rhinoceros, possibly blended with accounts of oryx or of Tibetan wild ass. Aristotle mentions one-horned animals, and Pliny repeats and elaborates, giving the monoceros a stag's head, elephant's feet and a black horn.

The decisive step is a translation error. The Hebrew Bible uses the word re'em for a wild bovine, an animal of great strength, the aurochs, now extinct. The translators of the Septuagint, in Alexandria in the third and second centuries BCE, rendered it monokeros, one-horn. Jerome's Latin Vulgate followed with unicornis and rinoceros. So passages such as Numbers 23:22 and Job 39:9-10, which describe an untameable wild ox, became in Greek, Latin and then English descriptions of a unicorn. The King James Version has unicorns in nine places, and the animal thereby acquired scriptural authority it never had in Hebrew.

That authority is the whole reason the unicorn was treated in medieval Europe as a real animal rather than a fable. It was in the Bible. Physicians, bestiarists and apothecaries proceeded accordingly, and alicorn, powdered unicorn horn, in practice narwhal tusk, was sold at extraordinary prices as an antidote to poison well into the seventeenth century.

The Virgin, the Tapestries, and the Eastern Parallels

The story that a unicorn can only be captured by a virgin, in whose lap it lays its head and sleeps until the hunters come, is not classical. It appears in the Physiologus, a Greek Christian compilation of animal allegories written in Alexandria probably in the second century, which pairs each creature with a doctrinal reading. The unicorn's small size, fierceness and capture by a maiden are read as the incarnation: Christ, whom no power could hold, taken into the womb of the Virgin.

The Physiologus was translated into Latin, Syriac, Armenian, Ethiopic and most European vernaculars and became the basis of the medieval bestiary, which is why the unicorn hunt is one of the most reproduced images in European art. The two great surviving cycles are the Lady and the Unicorn, six tapestries woven in Flanders around 1500 and now at the Musee de Cluny in Paris, which present the five senses and a sixth panel whose meaning is disputed; and the Hunt of the Unicorn, seven tapestries of about the same date now at the Cloisters in New York, which follow the hunt through to the killing and then show the unicorn alive and enclosed in a garden.

Two animals frequently identified with the unicorn are not the same creature. The Chinese qilin is a composite auspicious beast whose appearance signals the arrival or passing of a sage; it may be depicted with one horn or two, and its associations are with benevolence and portent, not with virginity or purity. The Persian and Arabic karkadann is a fierce one-horned beast, ultimately the rhinoceros again, and in some late texts it acquires the maiden-taming motif by borrowing from the West. Treating the three as one animal travelling across Eurasia is a modern conflation.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Attested in Region

The Levant, Regions

An artefact of translation: the re'em of the Hebrew Bible rendered monoceros in the Septuagint.

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

The tapestry unicorn, taken alive only by a virgin, an allegory the church read as the Incarnation.

Source Man, Myth and MagicRichard Cavendish (ed.)

Disciplines That Use This

One of the animal spirits gathered under this discipline. Where a tradition restricts this material, the restriction is recorded on the tradition itself rather than repeated for each animal.

Sources
1. Physiologus
Anonymous (Physiologus tradition), University of Texas Press, 1979The unicorn chapter
Quote, The unicorn chapter
The Physiologus gives the unicorn its Christian allegorical reading.
View the Source
2. Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd edition
Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.), Macmillan Reference USA, 2007Re'emView the Source
Indica
Ctesias of Cnidus, Bloomsbury Academic (Bristol Classical Press), 2011The Indian one-horned beast
Quote, The Indian one-horned beast
Ctesias is the first traceable step in the descent of the unicorn.
View the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Man, Myth and Magic
Richard Cavendish (ed.), Marshall Cavendish, 1970View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.