Permission, Ownership and a Global Art Market

Rights to depict specific Dreaming stories and designs are governed by Aboriginal law as genuine intellectual and spiritual property, belonging to specific individuals, family groups or clan estates according to kinship and country based systems of custodianship, so that an artist paints only the stories and designs they hold recognised rights to under Aboriginal law, a governance structure that has, since the movement's growth, generated real and ongoing legal and ethical challenges around unauthorised copying, cultural appropriation and the sale of inauthentic work by artists without proper standing, issues Aboriginal art centres and Australian courts have both had to address directly in the decades since Papunya Tula's founding.

The movement has grown from its 1970s Central Desert origin into a major and economically significant contemporary Indigenous Australian art sector, with Aboriginal owned and governed art centres across the Western Desert, Arnhem Land and elsewhere supporting working artists, and paintings from the tradition's most celebrated senior artists command substantial prices in the international contemporary art market, a commercial success that sits, not always comfortably, alongside the movement's continuing function as a genuine expression of sacred Dreaming knowledge held under strict Aboriginal law rather than as ordinary secular decorative art.