Home›Articles›Mpashqana, the Interpreter Without QualificationArticlesMpashqana, the Interpreter Without QualificationArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Mpashqana, the Interpreter Without Qualification." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/ace-theodore-mpashqana-interpreter.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Mpashqana, the Interpreter Without Qualification. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/ace-theodore-mpashqana-interpreterCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-mpashqana-the-interpreter-without-qualif, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Mpashqana, the Interpreter Without Qualification}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/ace-theodore-mpashqana-interpreter}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreMpashqana, the Interpreter Without Qualification The Church of the East knows Theodore of Mopsuestia, who died in 428, simply as Mpashqana, the Interpreter, a title given without further qualification because no other figure is held to require the distinction. The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity records that Theodore's Antiochene method of exegesis, historical and literal in its approach to scripture rather than allegorical in the manner favored by the rival school at Alexandria, became the normative method of biblical interpretation across the whole of East Syriac Christianity, shaping how generations of the church's scholars read and taught the text long after Theodore's own death. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church notes that Theodore's influence reached well beyond exegesis alone, since his christological vocabulary, distinguishing the divine and human natures in Christ with a precision his critics later read as excessive, underlies the two qnome formula that the Church of the East continues to confess as its own account of the incarnation, making Theodore not merely a respected commentator within the tradition but one of the formative sources of its distinctive theological language.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnTheodore of Mopsuestia as the Authoritative Interpreter of Scripture, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian ChristianityChristoph Baumertier 1SourcesThe Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianitytier 1Christoph Baumer, I. B. Tauris, London, 2006The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity, on Theodore's Antiochene exegesis as normativeThe Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editiontier 1F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, on Theodore's christological vocabulary underlying the two qnome formulaView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year