Home›Articles›Condemned by a Council His Own Church Never ReceivedArticlesCondemned by a Council His Own Church Never ReceivedArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Condemned by a Council His Own Church Never Received." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/ace-theodore-threechapters-condemned.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Condemned by a Council His Own Church Never Received. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/ace-theodore-threechapters-condemnedCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-condemned-by-a-council-his-own-church-ne, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Condemned by a Council His Own Church Never Received}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/ace-theodore-threechapters-condemned}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreCondemned by a Council His Own Church Never Received More than a century after Theodore's death, the Second Council of Constantinople condemned him by name in 553, in the affair remembered as the Three Chapters controversy, retroactively anathematizing a teacher whose own writings had been read as broadly acceptable, and in some quarters celebrated, during his own lifetime. The "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable Misnomer records that the Church of the East neither received this council nor accepted its condemnation, continuing to honor Theodore as Mpashqana precisely because the council that anathematized him belongs to a conciliar tradition the Church of the East had already separated from more than a century earlier, at the time of Ephesus in 431, and so carries no binding authority over it. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine situates the posthumous condemnation within a wider pattern in which later theological disputes reshaped how earlier, more ambiguous figures came to be read, Theodore's own writings interpreted retrospectively through controversies that arose only after his death. A father honored without reservation by one church and formally anathematized by another stands as one of the sharpest and most concrete markers of the division between the two conciliar traditions.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnTheodore of Mopsuestia as the Authoritative Interpreter of Scripture, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source The "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable MisnomerSebastian P. Brocktier 1SourcesThe "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable Misnomertier 1Sebastian P. Brock, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 1996The "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable Misnomer, on the church's non-reception of the Second Council of ConstantinopleThe Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrinetier 1Jaroslav Pelikan, University of Chicago Press, 1971The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, Volume 1, on retrospective reinterpretation of earlier figuresView the SourceThe Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianitytier 1Christoph Baumer, I. B. Tauris, London, 2006The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity, corroborating the Church of the East's own account of its non-reception of the council.Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year