Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

A Letter Sanskrit Does Not Need and Vedic Does

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
A Letter Sanskrit Does Not Need and Vedic Does

Classical Sanskrit does not treat the retroflex lateral as a separate sound, and by the standards of the classical grammar the letter is unnecessary. Vedic recitation keeps it, and the received text of the Rigveda writes it wherever a voiced retroflex stop stands between vowels, so the oldest layer of the literature uses a sign that the later layer does not. The substitution is described in the classical grammars, and it is one of the clearest cases in the alphabet of a letter preserved by a tradition of recitation rather than by the grammar of the written language.

The sound is otherwise a living one across a wide area. Several Middle Indo-Aryan dialects use it, it is current in Marathi, Gujarati and Oriya among the modern Indo-Aryan languages, and it is standard equipment across the Dravidian family, so a script serving any of those needs the letter whatever Sanskrit requires.

Its position at the end of the consonants, after the aspirate that closes the inherited order, marks it as an addition rather than an inheritance. That placement is the ordinary convention for anything added to a recited sequence, and the same position later received the three consonants that Tamil-Brahmi supplied for Dravidian sounds and, in some traditions, the cluster recited as a letter after them.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.