The main entry notes that the tradition itself casts the Buddha as a physician, and the comparison is worth taking further, since ancient Indian medicine used a structurally identical four-part diagnostic scheme scholars have long suspected shaped how the Four Noble Truths came to be formulated.
Classical Indian medical texts, most fully the Caraka Samhita, describe a standard procedure with four parts: the disease (roga), its cause (roga-hetu), the state of health free from disease (arogya), and the therapy that removes it (bhaisajya). The parallel to the Four Noble Truths, suffering, its cause, its cessation, and the path to cessation, is close enough that scholars including Kenneth Zysk have argued the Buddha and early community deliberately borrowed the framework of contemporary medical practice to present the dharma as a systematic diagnosis and cure.
Whether the borrowing was conscious or reflects a shared intellectual environment is not fully settled, but the parallel reinforces the main entry's point: a proper diagnosis in the medical tradition, as in the Buddhist scheme, is stated in order to be followed by a cause, a prognosis, and a treatment, so stopping at "life is suffering" is like a patient leaving an examination after hearing only the name of the disease, before the doctor explains what causes it, that it can be treated, and how.