Home›Articles›Phantasms of the Living, and the Attempt at an Evidence StandardArticlesPhantasms of the Living, and the Attempt at an Evidence StandardCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Phantasms of the Living, and the Attempt at an Evidence Standard." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/edmund-gurney-phantasms-of-the-living-and-the-attempt-at-an-evidence-standard.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Phantasms of the Living, and the Attempt at an Evidence Standard. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/edmund-gurney-phantasms-of-the-living-and-the-attempt-at-an-evidence-standardCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-phantasms-of-the-living-and-the-attempt, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Phantasms of the Living, and the Attempt at an Evidence Standard}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/edmund-gurney-phantasms-of-the-living-and-the-attempt-at-an-evidence-standard}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MorePhantasms of the Living, and the Attempt at an Evidence Standard Phantasms of the Living, published in 1886 under three names but written mostly by Gurney, was an attempt to do something nobody had tried: to treat a mass of ghost stories as a body of evidence with rules. Its subject was the crisis apparition, the report of seeing or hearing a person at approximately the moment of that person's distant death or serious injury. Gurney set conditions for admitting a case, requiring a first-hand account from the percipient, corroboration from someone told before the outcome was known, and documentary confirmation of the timing where it could be had, and he discarded a great many reports that failed them. He then argued statistically that coincidences of this kind occurred far more often than the death rate would allow. The critical response was immediate and has not been improved on much since: the recruitment of cases was not random, memory reshapes an experience once the outcome is known, and the base rate against which coincidence was measured rested on assumptions that could be disputed. The book nonetheless established that the question could be posed in evidential terms at all, and the collection remains a substantial documentary record of what late Victorians reported.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnEdmund Gurney, Historical Figures Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year