Home›Articles›Modern Spiritualism, and an Unexplained EndArticlesModern Spiritualism, and an Unexplained EndCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Modern Spiritualism, and an Unexplained End." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/frank-podmore-modern-spiritualism-and-an-unexplained-end.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Modern Spiritualism, and an Unexplained End. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/frank-podmore-modern-spiritualism-and-an-unexplained-endCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-modern-spiritualism-and-an-unexplained-e, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Modern Spiritualism, and an Unexplained End}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/frank-podmore-modern-spiritualism-and-an-unexplained-end}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreModern Spiritualism, and an Unexplained End Modern Spiritualism, published in two volumes in 1902, is Podmore's major work and is still cited by historians of the movement, which is unusual for a book written as a debunking. He traced the movement from the Fox sisters in New York State in 1848 through its spread across Britain and America, and worked through the major mediums case by case, setting out what had been claimed, what had been observed, and what ordinary explanation fitted. He was also the author of a substantial and unfriendly biography of Robert Owen and of a history of mesmerism, and the same method runs through all of them: establish the documentary record first, then ask what it will bear. His value to a reference work is that his scepticism was applied from inside, with full access to the society's files and to the investigators who had produced them, so his negative verdicts cannot be dismissed as the judgements of someone who had not looked. He drowned in a pond near Malvern in August 1910. The inquest did not determine how he came to be in the water, and the circumstances have never been explained. What the book cannot do, and does not claim to do, is prove a negative. Showing that a given effect could have been produced by a given trick is not the same as showing that it was, and Podmore was more careful about that distinction than many who have cited him since.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnFrank Podmore, Historical Figures Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year