Home›Articles›Fasting, Feasting, and a Modern CautionArticlesFasting, Feasting, and a Modern CautionCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Fasting, Feasting, and a Modern Caution." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/gluttony-gula-fasting-feasting-and-a-modern-caution.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Fasting, Feasting, and a Modern Caution. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/gluttony-gula-fasting-feasting-and-a-modern-cautionCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-fasting-feasting-and-a-modern-caution, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Fasting, Feasting, and a Modern Caution}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/gluttony-gula-fasting-feasting-and-a-modern-caution}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreFasting, Feasting, and a Modern Caution The counterpart of the vice in practice is the discipline of fasting, which Christianity shares with Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism, and which in the Christian calendar structures Lent, Advent and the weekly fast days that the atlas records under Holidays. Fasting in the tradition is a training of the will, not a rejection of food, and the feast is as much part of the pattern as the fast. A caution belongs here that the older sources do not supply: the vocabulary of gluttony has in modern use been turned against people for their bodies, and the moral tradition does not license that. The vice as the tradition defines it is a disorder of desire and of the will, not a matter of size, and eating disorders are illnesses to be treated rather than sins to be confessed. The Rule of Benedict, written in the sixth century and still followed by Benedictine communities, translates the doctrine of gluttony into concrete regulation, specifying in its thirty-ninth chapter that two cooked dishes should suffice for the daily meal so that a monk unable to eat one might still eat the other, while reserving a third dish of fresh fruit or vegetables and forbidding the flesh of four-footed animals except for the sick, rules later Benedictine congregations have interpreted with varying strictness, illustrating how the abstract vice of gluttony was translated, community by community, into an actual dietary regime rather than left as pure moral theory.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnGluttony (Gula), Vices Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year