Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

A Brother Sold for Silver, Named Without Being Named

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
A Brother Sold for Silver, Named Without Being Named

The pairing with Parashah Vayeshev, whose central episode is Joseph sold by his own brothers to passing traders for silver, rests on Amos's opening condemnation of a people who sell the righteous for silver and the needy for a pair of sandals, language close enough to Joseph's own sale that the connection has been read as deliberate since ancient times, even though Amos never names Joseph directly in this particular verse.

Where the parashah tells Joseph's sale as a specific family betrayal, driven by jealousy over their father's favoritism and Joseph's own dreams of future authority over his brothers, Amos generalizes the same transaction, a human being's worth reduced to a trivial price, into a standing social crime the prophet condemns across the whole nation centuries later, treating Joseph's brothers' betrayal as the founding instance of a pattern that never fully disappeared.

The haftarah's closing argument, that the prophet must speak because God has spoken, mirrors a quieter thread within the parashah itself: Joseph, sold into slavery through no fault of his own, nonetheless rises through Potiphar's household and eventually Egypt's own government, a pattern the tradition reads as evidence that what people intend for harm, providence can still turn toward an unlooked for outcome.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.