Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Lines Two and Five, the Two Central Lines

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Lines Two and Five, the Two Central Lines

This profile pairs the two positions that classical Yijing commentary regards most highly, and it is also one of the three pairs whose relation Human Design genuinely inherits.

The centres of the two trigrams

A hexagram is read as two stacked trigrams of three lines. The second line is the centre of the lower trigram and the fifth is the centre of the upper. Centrality is the strongest positive marker in the commentarial tradition, and the fifth line, being central in the upper trigram, is conventionally the ruling position of the figure.

And they correspond

Commentary further holds that line two and line five stand in a relation of correspondence, one of three such pairs, the others being one with four and three with six. Human Design's twelve profiles include exactly those three pairs among its six separations of three positions, so this relation is a real structural inheritance rather than a coincidence of numbering.

What is not inherited

The role names Human Design attaches to the six lines, and the reading of a pair as a personality, are the system's own, published by Ra Uru Hu in 1987. Classical commentary treats the lines as positions in a described situation, not as human types, and nothing in it evaluates a person by which two lines their birth chart activates.

The atlas records the inherited structure and the modern interpretation as two different things.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.