Home›Articles›An Imperial Relic, and the Weapon It Probably IsArticlesAn Imperial Relic, and the Weapon It Probably IsCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "An Imperial Relic, and the Weapon It Probably Is." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/kunsthistorisches-museum-an-imperial-relic-and-the-weapon-it-probably-is.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). An Imperial Relic, and the Weapon It Probably Is. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/kunsthistorisches-museum-an-imperial-relic-and-the-weapon-it-probably-isCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-an-imperial-relic-and-the-weapon-it-prob, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {An Imperial Relic, and the Weapon It Probably Is}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/kunsthistorisches-museum-an-imperial-relic-and-the-weapon-it-probably-is}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreAn Imperial Relic, and the Weapon It Probably Is The Holy Lance of Vienna is first recorded among the possessions of the Ottonian emperors in the tenth century, prized as a relic of Saint Maurice, the Roman soldier-martyr, and carried into battle as a token of divine favour; Otto I is said to have carried it at the decisive battle of Lechfeld in 955. Only later, from around the thirteenth century, did a competing identification take hold, linking the lance instead to the Roman soldier Longinus, said in later Christian tradition to have pierced the side of the crucified Jesus. Modern metallurgical and art-historical examination has resolved the physical question without settling the devotional one: the lance's core is a Carolingian-period weapon, probably seventh or eighth century, later fitted with silver bands and gold cuffs inscribed with the names of Christ's Passion, additions made centuries after the object itself was forged. The lance's ownership after the Empire's dissolution in 1806 stayed with the Habsburgs rather than passing to any successor German state, and it left Vienna only once in the modern era, when Nazi Germany moved it to Nuremberg in 1938 after the annexation of Austria and returned it to the Schatzkammer after the war in 1946. The museum today presents both the relic tradition and the archaeological dating side by side rather than asserting either as settled fact.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnKunsthistorisches Museum, Custodians & Museums Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year