The Tetrabiblos includes a chapter on the diseases of the soul, and it is the closest thing classical astrology has to an account of moral failure. It should be read with its assumptions visible.
The chapter proceeds from the same two part psychology as the chapter on the quality of the soul. Excesses of the rational part are read from Mercury, excesses of the sensitive part from the Moon, and the malefics afflicting either produce the conditions the text names. What it names includes things a modern reader would call illness, things they would call crime, and things they would call neither, in one list and without the distinctions now considered basic.
That is the point at which description has to be careful. The atlas records that the tradition held these views and the technical means by which it reached them. It does not present them as an account of character that anyone should use, and it does not translate the categories into modern diagnostic language, because doing so would lend an ancient list a clinical authority it never had and cannot support.
What remains usable is the structure rather than the content. Astrology's contribution to ethical description was the idea that dispositions can be examined separately, weighed against one another, and read for proportion rather than for presence or absence. That way of thinking about character survives the particular judgements the sources attached to it.