Home›Articles›A Second, Deeper Dig at the Same MoundArticlesA Second, Deeper Dig at the Same MoundCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Second, Deeper Dig at the Same Mound." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/national-museum-new-delhi-a-second-deeper-dig-at-the-same-mound.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Second, Deeper Dig at the Same Mound. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/national-museum-new-delhi-a-second-deeper-dig-at-the-same-moundCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-second-deeper-dig-at-the-same-mound, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Second, Deeper Dig at the Same Mound}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/national-museum-new-delhi-a-second-deeper-dig-at-the-same-mound}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Second, Deeper Dig at the Same Mound The Kapilavastu relics did not come from a new site but from a second, more careful excavation of the same Piprahwa stupa mound that William Peppe had partly dug in 1898. In 1971, the Archaeological Survey of India, led by K. M. Srivastava, reopened the mound and this time dug below the floor level Peppe had reached, exposing an earlier construction phase and recovering two inscribed steatite caskets that Peppe's shallower dig had missed entirely. The Archaeological Survey retained this later material for the national collection in New Delhi rather than sending it to Kolkata, keeping the two excavations' finds administratively separate even though they came from the same mound decades apart. The identification of Piprahwa with ancient Kapilavastu, the Buddha's childhood home, rests substantially on inscriptions recovered across both digs, though the reading and dating of the crucial texts have been debated by specialists, complicated further by a documented history of forged Buddhist inscriptions from other sites in the same region during the colonial period, which has made scholars appropriately cautious about any single reading. The museum presents the identification as the leading scholarly view rather than as beyond question, consistent with the archaeological literature's own caution on the point.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnNational Museum, New Delhi, Custodians & Museums Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year