Learn More
Standard Teaching Across a Movement
Because human nature is already good on the New Thought account, the work religion does changes shape considerably from its more familiar Christian form. Rather than securing rescue from an inherited guilt through a substitutionary sacrifice made on a believer's behalf, the task becomes recognising a goodness already present, so that neither original sin nor substitutionary atonement functions as a live category within New Thought teaching at all. This is not a formally defined, centrally adjudicated doctrine binding on every affiliated congregation the way a creed might bind a confessional church; it is closer to a shared premise running consistently across the movement's separately organised bodies, expressed independently by Unity, Religious Science and Divine Science without a single governing council standing over all three. The International New Thought Alliance, formed in 1914 to give the wider movement some organisational coherence, reflects this same premise in asserting that sin and illness stem from incorrect thinking rather than from an inherited fallen condition, treating the rejection of original sin as characteristic of the movement as a whole rather than the position of any one of its constituent churches alone.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.