Where most Titan names resist confident etymology only in their details, Oceanus's name has drawn a more specific and more debated proposal: that it may not be a native Greek word at all. The Greek Okeanos does not derive cleanly from any obvious Greek root, and some philologists, most notably the classicist Martin Litchfield West in his study of Near Eastern influence on early Greek cosmogony, have proposed that the name and perhaps the underlying concept of a great encircling river of primordial water may reflect contact with Near Eastern ideas, comparable to the Babylonian Apsu, the fresh subterranean waters personified as a primeval being in the Enuma Elish, or the Egyptian Nun, the boundless waters of chaos that preceded and surround creation. Hesiod's Theogony, composed against a wider eastern Mediterranean background of contact between early Greek speakers and older Near Eastern civilizations, contains other suggestive parallels to Mesopotamian and Levantine mythological material that West and other scholars have catalogued at length, and Oceanus's resistance to Greek etymology is one piece of that larger, still debated case for eastern influence on early Greek cosmology.
The proposal remains a hypothesis rather than an established fact, since a genuine borrowing is difficult to prove from etymology alone, and other linguists continue to defend native Greek or pre-Greek explanations for the name. What the debate illustrates plainly is that Oceanus, the river imagined to encircle the whole known world, sits at a genuine scholarly frontier concerning how open the early Greek imagination was to absorbing ideas from beyond its own borders.