Home›Articles›John Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex MarriageArticlesJohn Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex MarriageArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "John Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex Marriage." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/oneida-complexmarriage-noyes-doctrine.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). John Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex Marriage. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/oneida-complexmarriage-noyes-doctrineCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-john-humphrey-noyes-doctrine-of-complex, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {John Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex Marriage}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/oneida-complexmarriage-noyes-doctrine}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreJohn Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex Marriage John Humphrey Noyes founded the Oneida Community in upstate New York in 1848 on the doctrine he called complex marriage, which held that every man in the community was married to every woman and every woman to every man, so exclusive pair bonding, along with the private property in a spouse it implied, was abolished as a form of selfishness incompatible with the perfected Christian life the community believed itself already living. Bible Communism, the community's own compilation of its founding theological reports, presents complex marriage as the logical extension of holding all property in common: if believers had already given up private ownership of goods and land for the community's shared benefit, Noyes argued, consistency required giving up exclusive ownership of a spouse as well, since the New Testament nowhere specifically institutes monogamous marriage as a permanent Christian requirement. In practice, any adult member could request relations with any other consenting adult member through an intermediary system intended to prevent exclusive attachments, which the community's leadership actively discouraged and at times formally intervened to break up when a couple showed signs of preferring each other over the wider community, since special love for one partner was itself treated as a doctrinal failure.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnComplex marriage, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source Bible Communism: A Compilation from the Annual Reports and Other Publications of the Oneida AssociationOneida Associationtier 1SourcesBible Communism: A Compilation from the Annual Reports and Other Publications of the Oneida Associationtier 1Oneida Association, 1853Bible Communism, the Oneida Association's own compilation stating complex marriage as an extension of shared propertyWithout Sin: The Life and Death of the Oneida Communitytier 1Spencer Klaw, Penguin Books, 1993Klaw's history of the Oneida Community, on the practical operation of complex marriageView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year