Home›Articles›The 1923 Congress and the Milankovic Leap RuleArticlesThe 1923 Congress and the Milankovic Leap RuleArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The 1923 Congress and the Milankovic Leap Rule." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/revised-julian-calendar-1923-congress.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The 1923 Congress and the Milankovic Leap Rule. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/revised-julian-calendar-1923-congressCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-1923-congress-and-the-milankovic-lea, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The 1923 Congress and the Milankovic Leap Rule}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/revised-julian-calendar-1923-congress}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThe 1923 Congress and the Milankovic Leap Rule In May 1923 a pan-Orthodox congress meeting in Constantinople took up a proposal to bring the fixed feasts back into alignment with the seasons without simply adopting the Gregorian calendar wholesale. The congress's astronomical delegate, the Serbian scientist Milutin Milankovic, proposed a new leap year rule: a year divisible by four is a leap year, except that a year divisible by one hundred is not, unless dividing it by nine hundred leaves a remainder of two hundred or six hundred, in which case it is a leap year after all. That rule tracks the true solar year even more closely than the Gregorian reform of 1582, and the two calendars will not diverge by even a single day until the year 2800. On the ground the change was simple: 1 October under the old Julian reckoning became 14 October, dropping thirteen days at a stroke. What the congress adopted was narrower than a full modernisation. It moved only the fixed feasts onto the new reckoning; the moveable cycle governing the date of Pascha stayed on the unrevised Julian computation, so churches that took up the reform kept a different Christmas from their Old Calendarist neighbours while continuing to celebrate Easter on exactly the same day as they always had.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Revised Julian Calendar for the Fixed Feasts, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source Milutin Milankovic and the Reform of the Julian Calendar in 1923 (Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage)M. S. Dimitrijevic, E. Th. Theodossiou and P. Z. Mantarakistier 1SourcesMilutin Milankovic and the Reform of the Julian Calendar in 1923 (Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage)tier 1M. S. Dimitrijevic, E. Th. Theodossiou and P. Z. Mantarakis, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, Volume 11, Issue 1, pages 50 to 54, 2008Milankovic's leap rule and the 1923 Constantinople congressView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year