Home›Articles›Attacked in 1998, and Never Independently ExaminedArticlesAttacked in 1998, and Never Independently ExaminedCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Attacked in 1998, and Never Independently Examined." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/sri-dalada-maligawa-attacked-in-1998-and-never-independently-examined.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Attacked in 1998, and Never Independently Examined. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/sri-dalada-maligawa-attacked-in-1998-and-never-independently-examinedCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-attacked-in-1998-and-never-independently, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Attacked in 1998, and Never Independently Examined}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/sri-dalada-maligawa-attacked-in-1998-and-never-independently-examined}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreAttacked in 1998, and Never Independently Examined The temple's modern history includes a serious act of violence: in January 1998, during Sri Lanka's civil war, a truck bomb attributed to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam exploded at the temple's entrance, killing several people and severely damaging the building's facade and roof, an attack widely understood as targeting the relic's symbolic importance to the Sinhalese Buddhist state rather than any purely military objective. The relic itself, kept deep within the building's nested chambers, survived undamaged, and the temple was subsequently restored. The tooth's authenticity, like other tooth relics claimed elsewhere in this atlas, most notably at Lingguang Temple in Beijing, has never been settled by independent physical examination, since the relic is not removed from its sequence of caskets for scientific study and is displayed to the public, when displayed at all, only briefly and from a distance. Sri Lankan Buddhist tradition treats the relic's documented arrival in the fourth century CE and its unbroken royal custody since as sufficient grounds for its veneration, a position of faith rather than one resting on forensic verification, and the temple's own presentation reflects that position rather than claiming scientific proof it has not sought.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnSri Dalada Maligawa, Custodians & Museums Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year