Home›Articles›Neither Order Nor Chaos Is Really ThereArticlesNeither Order Nor Chaos Is Really ThereCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Neither Order Nor Chaos Is Really There." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/the-aneristic-and-eristic-principles-neither-order-nor-chaos-is-really-there.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Neither Order Nor Chaos Is Really There. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/the-aneristic-and-eristic-principles-neither-order-nor-chaos-is-really-thereCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-neither-order-nor-chaos-is-really-there, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Neither Order Nor Chaos Is Really There}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/the-aneristic-and-eristic-principles-neither-order-nor-chaos-is-really-there}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreNeither Order Nor Chaos Is Really There The doctrine's sharper philosophical claim goes beyond simply rehabilitating disorder as a value equal to order. The Principia Discordia argues that both the Aneristic Principle and the Eristic Principle are patterns the mind projects onto a reality that, in itself, holds neither, a position with real affinities to strands of Zen Buddhist and Taoist thought about the mind's pattern-making tendency, though Discordianism arrived at it independently through its own satirical method rather than through study of those traditions. Practically, the doctrine asks a Discordian to hold every claim of order and every claim of disorder with equal suspicion, including Discordianism's own claims, which is why the tradition is comfortable being read as parody by outsiders and, on some readings, by its own founders. Kerry Thornley and Greg Hill both declined across their lives to settle whether Discordianism was a joke that became a genuine philosophy or a genuine philosophy conducted as a joke, treating the refusal to choose as itself the most Discordian possible answer.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Aneristic and Eristic Principles, Doctrines Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year