Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

A Miracle Absent From the Earliest Sources

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
A Miracle Absent From the Earliest Sources

First and Second Maccabees, written within a generation or two of the events of 164 BCE and the closest surviving sources to them, describe the rededication of the Temple and the establishment of an eight day festival in detail, but neither mentions any oil lasting beyond its measure. Second Maccabees instead explains the eight days as a delayed celebration of Sukkot, the harvest festival the fighters had been unable to observe properly while occupying the Temple. The historian Josephus, writing in the first century CE and closer in time to the Talmud's editors than to the Maccabees, also describes the festival, which he calls the Festival of Lights, without telling the oil story either.

Scholars of Second Temple and rabbinic Judaism, including Shaye Cohen, read this silence as evidence that the oil story is a later rabbinic elaboration rather than part of the earliest layer of Hanukkah tradition, composed or preserved by the rabbis of the Talmudic period for their own reasons, centuries after the fact. Whether the rabbis invented the story outright or drew on an oral tradition that had simply gone unrecorded in the earlier written sources is not something the surviving evidence can settle either way.

Sources First and Second MaccabeesAnonymous with From the Maccabees to the MishnahShaye J. D. Cohen

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.