Home›Articles›A Permission, Not an OrderArticlesA Permission, Not an OrderCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Permission, Not an Order." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/the-nikujiku-saitai-decree-of-1872-a-permission-not-an-order.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Permission, Not an Order. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/the-nikujiku-saitai-decree-of-1872-a-permission-not-an-orderCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-permission-not-an-order, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Permission, Not an Order}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/the-nikujiku-saitai-decree-of-1872-a-permission-not-an-order}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Permission, Not an Order The text of the proclamation is one sentence. From now on, it says, Buddhist clergy are at liberty to eat meat, to marry, to grow their hair, and so forth; and when they are not engaged in religious observances they may wear ordinary clothing. A separate decree of 1873 extended the liberty to nuns. Everything turns on the difference between permitting and requiring. Under the Tokugawa shogunate the precepts of the Buddhist orders had been matters of state law. A priest found to have broken celibacy could be exiled or paraded in public, and temples had been made instruments of population registration, so the clergy were a supervised class. The Meiji government withdrew that supervision. It did not tell monks to marry; it stopped punishing them for it, and simultaneously removed the legal privileges of the clerical status. The reaction inside the orders was not gratitude. Several denominations petitioned against the decree, arguing that the state had no business dissolving vows it had not administered, and that a permission from outside the tradition was as much an interference as a prohibition had been. Some sects continued to discipline married clergy internally for decades. The Jodo Shinshu tradition was the exception with nothing to change: its clergy had married openly since Shinran in the thirteenth century, and the decree simply made the rest of Japanese Buddhism resemble it.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Nikujiku Saitai Decree of 1872, Religious Legal Instruments Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year