Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

What Made It Possible

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
What Made It Possible

The proclamation was granted, but it was not given freely. It closed twenty years of organised pressure.

The Vaikom satyagraha of 1924 and 1925 contested the roads rather than the sanctum: volunteers, including Ezhavas, Nairs and Christians, occupied the approaches to the Vaikom Mahadeva temple to establish a right of passage. It drew Periyar E. V. Ramasamy from Madras, brought Gandhi to negotiate in 1925, and ended with three of the four roads opened. The Guruvayur satyagraha of 1931 and 1932, led by K. Kelappan, targeted a temple directly and included a fast; a referendum of caste Hindus in the locality returned a majority for entry, and the temple's authorities still refused.

Behind the campaigns lay a longer social movement. Narayana Guru, an Ezhava ascetic who consecrated a Shiva image at Aruvippuram in 1888 with the announcement that it was an Ezhava Shiva, had spent forty years arguing that ritual exclusion had no basis in the tradition it claimed. His organisation, the SNDP Yogam, supplied much of the movement's membership.

The state also had reasons of its own. Conversion to Christianity and to Islam among excluded communities was substantial and was noticed. Sir C. P. Ramaswami Iyer, the Dewan, is generally credited with persuading the palace that the proclamation was the safer course.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.