Home›Articles›Peyote, and Two Very Different TraditionsArticlesPeyote, and Two Very Different TraditionsCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Peyote, and Two Very Different Traditions." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/uto-aztecan-peoples-peyote-and-two-very-different-traditions.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Peyote, and Two Very Different Traditions. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/uto-aztecan-peoples-peyote-and-two-very-different-traditionsCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-peyote-and-two-very-different-traditions, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Peyote, and Two Very Different Traditions}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/articles/uto-aztecan-peoples-peyote-and-two-very-different-traditions}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MorePeyote, and Two Very Different Traditions Two religious traditions in this grouping involve peyote and they are not the same thing. The Wixarika of the Sierra Madre Occidental undertake an annual pilgrimage east to Wirikuta in the state of San Luis Potosi, where the cactus grows, and the journey, the hunt for it and the ceremonies attached are part of a tradition with its own elders, its own ritual specialists and its own conditions. The Raramuri further north have their own practice. Separately, from the late nineteenth century, peyote ceremonies spread among peoples of the southern plains and beyond and were formalised in the Native American Church, which is a distinct institution with its own history and its own legal standing in the United States, protected by federal statute for enrolled members of federally recognised tribes. Some of its members are Uto-Aztecan speakers and most are not. The atlas keeps the two apart because collapsing them is common and wrong, and it describes both without instructing in either. Wirikuta is under pressure from mining concessions, and the Wixarika have pursued that in Mexican courts, which is a current matter rather than an ethnographic one. Hopi practice belongs in neither category and is subject to explicit restrictions set by the Hopi Tribe and by individual villages on recording, photographing and describing ceremony. Those restrictions are recorded in this atlas as a rights gate and are honoured in what it publishes.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnUto-Aztecan Peoples, Culture Groups Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year