Origin Taught by Joseph Smith in the King Follett discourse, 1844
Eternal progression is the Latter-day Saint teaching that human beings are of the same order of existence as God and may, through covenant, ordinance and obedience, be exalted to become as he is, inheriting the fullness of the Father in an endless increase. Joseph Smith stated it in the King Follett discourse of 1844, and Lorenzo Snow compressed it into a couplet holding that as man is God once was and as God is man may become. Sealed marriage is central, since exaltation is held to be received in family relation rather than individually. The doctrine is the sharpest single break with classical Christian theism, which holds God to be of a wholly different order than creatures. The Eastern Christian doctrine of theosis is superficially similar but denies precisely this, insisting the divine essence is never shared.
Facts
Belief
SubjectDeath, rebirth and destiny 1 Category of Belief Status
Status Within the TraditionBinding, without a formal definition 1Tradition: Latter-day Saints (Mormonism) Held Origins
Origin PeriodTaught by Joseph Smith in the King Follett discourse, 1844 1 Learn More
Eternal Progression and Exaltation
Latter-day Saints affirm eternal progression (that human beings are the spirit children of God who existed before birth, are here to gain a body and be tested, and may progress eternally), culminating in exaltation, the highest destiny of the redeemed, in which they become like God and inherit his glory, life, and creative capacities in eternal families. The teaching includes the conviction that God was once as humanity is and that faithful men and women may, through Christ, come to share the divine nature to the fullest degree.
The doctrine is traced to Joseph Smith's King Follett discourse, delivered in Nauvoo, Illinois, in April 1844 shortly before his death, and was later crystallised in a couplet attributed to the church's fifth president, Lorenzo Snow: "As man is, God once was; as God is, man may become." Even within the church the teaching has been handled with some caution in recent public statements: asked about it in a 1997 Time magazine interview, church president Gordon B. Hinckley responded that he was not sure it was often taught and that he did not know much about it, a response that drew notice precisely because the doctrine had long been treated as an authentic, if rarely elaborated, part of Latter-day Saint theology.
A Distinctive Vision of Destiny
This account of human origin and destiny is among the most distinctive Latter-day Saint teachings and differs markedly from the historic Christian view of an absolute Creator-creature distinction, in which humans are saved to fellowship with God but do not become gods in this sense. It gives Latter-day Saint life its strong emphasis on family, temple ordinances, and eternal marriage, through which exaltation is pursued.
The belief is presented here as Latter-day Saints hold it, noting that it is not shared by the trinitarian Christian traditions. The teaching rests on a broader Latter-day Saint metaphysics in which God the Father is understood to possess a glorified, physical body, a position articulated in Joseph Smith's 1843 revelation recorded as Doctrine and Covenants section 130, and matter itself is held to be eternal and uncreated. This departs sharply from the classical Christian doctrine of divine simplicity, affirmed at the councils of the fourth and fifth centuries, on which God is immaterial, uncreated in an absolute sense, and ontologically distinct in kind, not merely in degree, from any creature; historic Christian theology holds that believers are saved into loving union and glorified fellowship with God but explicitly rules out becoming God in nature, a distinction it regards as fundamental to monotheism itself.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.