Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

Restoration of the New Testament church

Core Tenets

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Restorationism holds that the church of the New Testament can and must be reconstituted directly from the New Testament, setting aside the creeds, the confessions and the denominational structures that grew up afterwards, on the ground that they are additions rather than developments. Its slogans state it plainly: no creed but Christ, no book but the Bible, and where the scriptures speak we speak. It goes further than sola scriptura, which the Reformers held while keeping the creeds and writing new confessions of their own. It is why the Disciples of Christ and the Churches of Christ appear here without a confessional subscription while every other body of comparable size has one.

Facts
Belief
Subject
Religious authority and succession 1
Category of Belief
Core Tenets 1
Origins
Held By
The Restorationist churches: the Disciples of Christ and the Churches of Christ. 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1
Learn More
Two Frontier Movements That Chose to Stop Being Two

Restorationism in America traces to two independent revivals that reached the same conclusion from different starting points. Barton Stone's Cane Ridge camp meeting in Kentucky in August 1801 drew tens of thousands and left Stone convinced that denominational creeds were obstacles to the unity Christ had actually asked for; he and his colleagues dissolved their own presbytery in 1804, declaring in a document they called its Last Will and Testament that they wished only to sink into union with the body of Christ at large. Alexander Campbell arrived at nearly the same position by a different route, publishing his Declaration and Address in 1809 to argue that the New Testament alone, read without the accumulated weight of confession and council, was sufficient to reconstitute the church. J. Gordon Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religions records that the two movements, Stone's Christians and Campbell's Disciples, did not merge because a central authority ordered it; there was none. They united on the last day of 1831 at a Lexington, Kentucky meeting house because leaders on both sides recognized they were already pursuing the identical restoration and had no principled reason left to remain apart.

The Census That Recorded a Division It Did Not Create

The united movement's own insistence on New Testament practice eventually produced a division inside itself. Through the second half of the nineteenth century, congregations disagreed sharply over instrumental music in worship and over missionary societies organized above the local congregation, both of which one wing read as unauthorized additions to the New Testament pattern the movement existed to restore, and the other read as reasonable means to a shared end. Neither side changed the other's mind, and the disagreement widened for decades before any outside body acknowledged it. When the United States Bureau of the Census conducted its special religious census in 1906, it listed Churches of Christ separately from the Disciples of Christ for the first time, a recognition the editor David Lipscomb accepted as accurate and James Garrison, on the Disciples side, did not. The government had not ruled on the question or forced the split; it had simply reported what congregations already knew about themselves, that two identifiably different bodies existed where one restoration movement had begun. Weekly communion and a plain reading of scripture as the sole rule of faith survived in both wings; the instrument and the society did not.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Churches of Christ (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, WikipediaView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.