Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Apotheosis

Also Known As Consecratio · ruler deification
God and Divine Nature

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Apotheosis names the passage of a human being into divine status. In Rome the senate voted the consecratio of a dead emperor, after which he was a divus with his own temple, priests and festival, and refusal of the vote was itself a political verdict. Elsewhere the process is devotional rather than legislative: Guan Yu, a third-century general, and Mazu, a Fujianese woman remembered as a protector of sailors, both became widely worshipped gods, and Imhotep, an official of the Third Dynasty, was worshipped as a healing god in Egypt more than two thousand years after his death. Apotheosis should not be confused with theosis, the Eastern Christian doctrine of the believer's participation in the divine life, which has its own entry and concerns ordinary believers rather than rulers.

Facts
Attestation
Earliest Attestation
The Roman Senate could vote a deceased emperor divus following funeral rites, beginning with Julius Caesar and continuing as a regular honor for emperors judged to have ruled well. 1
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The formal elevation of a human being, typically a ruler, to divine status, either during life or, in the clearest historical cases, after death through religious or political ratification. 1
Origins
Held By
Recorded across multiple traditions independently: Ancient Egyptian religion, Chinese folk religion and Roman religion each hold rites or beliefs by which a mortal, typically a ruler or ancestor, is elevated to divine or semi-divine status after death. 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1
Learn More
Made Divine by Decree

Apotheosis names the elevation of a human being to divine status, either during life or, more commonly in the clearest historical cases, after death through formal religious or political ratification. Roman practice developed the clearest institutional form: the Senate could vote a deceased emperor divus, divine, following funeral rites that included the release of an eagle understood to carry the emperor's soul skyward, beginning with Julius Caesar and continuing as a regular, though not automatic, honor for emperors judged to have ruled well, while a tyrannical or widely hated emperor could instead suffer damnatio memoriae, the formal erasure of his memory and honors, the practice's deliberate opposite.

Chinese imperial religion developed a related but distinct practice in which deceased emperors, and in earlier periods living rulers who claimed the Mandate of Heaven, were understood to take up a position within an ordered bureaucratic pantheon of ancestral and cosmic spirits, an apotheosis embedded in the wider Chinese practice of ancestor veneration rather than modeled on the Roman senate's single formal vote. Japanese State Shinto in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries drew on a comparable logic in state doctrine holding the emperor to be a living deity, a position formally renounced by Emperor Hirohito in 1946.

A Political Tool as Much as a Religious Claim

Historians of Roman religion generally read imperial apotheosis as serving political functions inseparable from whatever religious belief accompanied it: formal deification by the Senate legitimated a new emperor's succession by tying him to a divine predecessor, and the honor could be withheld or, in rare cases, later revoked as a form of posthumous political judgment on a reign, making the practice as much an instrument of Roman politics as a straightforward religious conviction that the deified emperor now genuinely governed some portion of the cosmos. Roman elite opinion itself held mixed and sometimes openly skeptical views about how literally to take the deification of emperors, a skepticism the satirist Seneca's Apocolocyntosis, a mocking account of the emperor Claudius's posthumous divinization, illustrates directly from within the Roman literary tradition.

Apotheosis in this atlas is treated as a comparative category naming a recurring practice of formally elevating exceptional humans, chiefly rulers, to divine or quasi divine status, distinct from the broader and less formal phenomenon of a ruler simply being honored as unusually favored by the gods. Egyptian, Mesopotamian and other ancient Near Eastern kingship traditions developed their own related but distinct claims of royal divinity, generally treating the living king as divine or semi divine by nature rather than elevating him through a later, separate ceremony of deification.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th editionSimon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.)
Source The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th editionSimon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.)
Source The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th editionSimon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.)

Related To

The Roman Senate voted Julius Caesar's consecratio, the founding case this fact names; his own page independently names the same event as Divus Iulius.

Source The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th editionSimon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.)

The senate voted the consecratio that made a dead emperor a divus.

Sources
1. The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th edition
Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2012View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.