The end of the Neoplatonic path is not a vision of the One, since seeing requires a distinction between the seer and the seen. Plotinus describes instead a state in which the soul is no longer other than what it has reached. He treats it as rare and brief, and Porphyry, his student and editor, records how few times his teacher attained it and reports his own single experience late in life. The way there runs through moral purification, through turning from the outward world to the soul, and through the soul's own turning toward Intellect; the last step is described as lying outside anything a person can do deliberately, which is a difficulty the tradition acknowledges rather than solves. How far this can be aligned with the mystical writing of the traditions that later borrowed its vocabulary is discussed constantly and is not settled. The philosophical language is shared. The setting, and what is taken to be reached, are not.
Facts
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NotePlotinus treats it as rare and brief, and Porphyry, his student and editor, records how few times his teacher attained it and reports his own single experience late in life. The last step is described as lying outside anything a person can do deliberately, which is a difficulty the tradition acknowledges rather than solves. 1 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceNot a vision of the One, since seeing requires a distinction between the seer and the seen, but a state in which the soul is no longer other than what it has reached. 1 Belief
SubjectSalvation and liberation 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionDefined and binding within this tradition 1 Doctrinal CategorySalvation and Liberation 1 Learn More
Union by Subtraction, Not by Climbing
Hadot's reading of Plotinus turns on a word choice in his own book's title, simplicity rather than ascent, and the distinction matters for what henosis is actually supposed to be. A picture of climbing suggests the soul travels toward the One by adding capacities, moving through ever higher and more powerful states until it arrives. Hadot argues Plotinus describes the opposite process throughout, a stripping away of the very distinctions, between seer and seen, between the soul and what it contemplates, that make ordinary experience and even ordinary contemplation possible at all. What is reached is called simple because multiplicity itself, not merely ignorance or attachment, is the obstacle being removed, so the state Porphyry records his teacher entering only rarely is not a richer or fuller condition than ordinary awareness but a plainer one, with the machinery of subject and object taken away rather than perfected. This is why Plotinus insists the last step cannot be willed the way a climb can be pushed through by effort, an act of will is itself one more piece of the structure being simplified away, so the soul cannot reach for the One as its object without the reaching itself keeping the distance in place. Hadot's title names the whole argument in two words, and the difficulty the tradition never resolved, how a person deliberately abandons the last thing standing between themselves and the goal, follows directly from taking simplicity rather than ascent as the operative image.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.