Doctrines
The Ascended Masters
Also Known As Ascended Master · The Masters of the Ancient Wisdom The Theosophical name for them. · The Mahatmas Blavatsky's term. · The Great White Brotherhood
God and Divine Nature
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Ascended Masters are, in the traditions that teach them, human beings who have finished the work of incarnation and now act from outside it, guiding those who are still in it. The idea enters Western esotericism with the Theosophical Society, where Helena Blavatsky described correspondence and contact with adepts she called Mahatmas, and it was rebuilt in the 1930s by the I AM Activity around Saint Germain, then carried further by the Bridge to Freedom and the Church Universal and Triumphant. The claim has always been contested from inside as well as outside: the authenticity of the Theosophical letters was disputed in Blavatsky's own lifetime and remains so. What is not in dispute is the influence, since a great deal of later New Age teaching about guides and channelled masters descends from this line.
Facts
Disputed
Point in DisputeThat the Theosophical letters attributed to the Masters were produced by the Masters. 3 Richard Hodgson and the Committee of the Society for Psychical Research published their Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate Phenomena Connected with the Theosophical Society in the Society's Proceedings in 1885, examining the letters Helena Blavatsky attributed to the Ascended Masters and the physical phenomena said to accompany their delivery. Hodgson's method combined handwriting analysis and interviews conducted in India with witnesses and Blavatsky's own household staff, and the committee concluded the phenomena had been produced by ordinary means rather than by the Masters. Theosophical writers have contested the committee's methods and specific factual findings ever since, so the dispute over the letters' authorship remains live rather than closed. Belief
SubjectReligious authority and succession 1 Origins
Held ByTheosophy, the I AM Activity and the traditions descended from them 1 Historical OriginThe idea enters Western esotericism with the Theosophical Society, where Helena Blavatsky described correspondence and contact with adepts she called Mahatmas, and it was rebuilt in the 1930s by the I AM Activity around Saint Germain. 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionDefined and binding within this tradition 1 Doctrinal CategoryRevelation, Covenant and Prophecy 1 Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteThe claim has always been contested from inside as well as outside, and the authenticity of the Theosophical letters was disputed in the lifetime of Blavatsky and remains so. What is not in dispute is the influence, since a great deal of later New Age teaching about guides and channelled masters descends from this line. 2 Learn More
From Mahatmas to Masters
The idea arrives in its modern form with the Theosophical Society. Helena Blavatsky described a brotherhood of adepts, living men of extraordinary attainment resident in Tibet and elsewhere, and named two of them, Koot Hoomi and Morya, as her own teachers. Between 1880 and 1884 letters attributed to these adepts reached the Theosophist A. P. Sinnett, sometimes appearing in a cabinet or falling from the ceiling, and they contain a good deal of the doctrine that later Theosophy rests on.
The Society for Psychical Research sent Richard Hodgson to India to investigate, and his report of 1885 concluded that the phenomena were produced by Blavatsky and confederates and that the letters were her own work. The report was widely accepted and remains the standard sceptical account.
It has also been contested from within the same society. In the 1980s and 1990s Vernon Harrison, a document examiner and a member of the Society for Psychical Research, published a detailed criticism arguing that Hodgson had worked selectively, that his handwriting analysis did not meet the standards of the discipline, and that the letters are not simply Blavatsky writing in disguise. The Society printed both. The atlas records the dispute as a live one rather than treating either report as final, and notes that neither report establishes that the adepts existed.
Saint Germain, the I AM Activity, and the Line After It
The teaching was rebuilt in the 1930s in the United States. Guy Ballard reported meeting the Count of Saint Germain on the slopes of Mount Shasta in California, and with his wife Edna founded the I AM Activity, which grew rapidly through public lectures, decrees spoken aloud, and a distinctive use of colour and light. Where Theosophy had described living adepts, the I AM teaching described masters who had ascended, leaving the body entirely, and it made Saint Germain rather than the Tibetan adepts the central figure.
The movement produced a Supreme Court case. After Guy Ballard death, family members were prosecuted for mail fraud on the theory that they knew their religious claims to be false. The Court held in 1944 that a jury may not be asked to decide whether a religious belief is true, only whether the person holding it was sincere, and the decision has been foundational in American law on religion ever since. A group that most Americans have never heard of therefore set the terms on which every later claim of religious fraud has been argued.
The line continued through the Bridge to Freedom in the 1950s and then through the Church Universal and Triumphant, founded by Mark Prophet and led after his death by Elizabeth Clare Prophet, which added a large body of dictations. A great deal of later New Age teaching about guides, channelled masters and the ascended hierarchy descends from this sequence, usually without the institutional history attached.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Related To
Two versions of the same institutional move, hidden authorities standing behind a visible order.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.