The Homeric Hymn to Demeter, which presents itself as the charter of the Eleusinian rites, says that the person who has seen these things is blessed, and that whoever has no part in them does not share the same lot once dead. Pindar and Sophocles say the same in their own words, and the claim recurs across centuries of Greek writing. That it could be said at all is the important point. The Mysteries were protected by a prohibition taken seriously enough to be prosecuted in Athenian courts, but the promise was not the secret; what was shown in the hall was. So the tradition's central claim survives intact while nearly everything that supported it is lost. What the better portion consisted of is nowhere spelled out. There is no Eleusinian account of judgement, no described place, and no moral condition attached beyond initiation itself, an absence that troubled ancient critics as much as it puzzles modern readers.
Facts
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteWhat the better portion consisted of is nowhere spelled out. There is no Eleusinian account of judgement, no described place, and no moral condition attached beyond initiation itself, an absence that troubled ancient critics as much as it puzzles modern readers. 1 Origins
Held ByThe Eleusinian Mysteries 1 Position Profile
Key TextThe Homeric Hymn to Demeter, which presents itself as the charter of the rites and says that the person who has seen these things is blessed, and that whoever has no part in them does not share the same lot once dead. 1 Belief
SubjectDeath, rebirth and destiny 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 1 Doctrinal Category Learn More
What Every Other Greek Shade Was Promised Instead
Homer's own epics describe the fate the Mysteries were an exception to. In the Odyssey's account of the underworld, the ghost of Achilles, greatest of the Greek dead, tells Odysseus he would rather be a landless labourer serving a poor man on earth than rule as king over all the perished, and the poem gives no other shade a better portion to hope for, the dead in Homer being witless shades in an indistinct grey crowd, heroes and cowards alike, with nothing in the epic tradition resembling reward or judgement. Burkert reads the Eleusinian promise directly against this backdrop rather than in isolation, as the specific point where Greek religion broke with its own dominant epic picture of death and offered something Homer's poems had refused anyone, a portion after death that depended on something a person had done in life. The mysteries did not replace the Homeric underworld with a different geography, no Eleusinian text describes one, a silence the ancient sources themselves leave unexplained. What they added was a distinction inside a fate that had previously admitted none, initiated and uninitiated where Homer had only the dead, and it is against the flatness of Achilles's complaint that the promise of a better lot reads as the departure it was, rather than as one more variation on a theme Greek religion had already supplied.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Stated in public Greek poetry, which is why this claim survives where the content of the rite does not.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.