Doctrines
Wu wei
Also Known As Wu-wei · non-action · effortless actionOriginal Term wuwei (無為), non-doing
The Way and the Virtues
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 400 BCE to 250 BCE
Wu wei is usually rendered non-action, which misleads readers into imagining a doctrine of doing nothing. The texts intend something more specific: action that does not strain against the grain of things, that responds to a situation as water finds its level, and in which the actor's calculating, self-asserting will is absent. The Daode jing praises the ruler who governs by wu wei so lightly that the people say the good order arose of itself, and the Zhuangzi illustrates it with the cook whose blade slips through the ox along the natural seams without dulling.
The concept is genuinely contested. It plainly does not mean inertia, since the sage accomplishes a great deal; but scholars disagree over whether it means abstaining from certain kinds of action, or performing all action in a certain frame of mind, and over how a value that disparages deliberate effort can be deliberately cultivated without self-contradiction. That paradox, of trying not to try, is treated by some as an incoherence and by others as the exact spiritual problem the tradition means to pose.
Facts
Status
Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 1Tradition: Taoism The received account of effortless action Doctrinal CategoryThe Way and the Virtues 1 Origins
Origin Period Learn More
Doing by Not Forcing
Wu wei is literally "non-action," but the phrase is misleading, and the concept is not passivity. It names action that does not force, action so attuned to the situation that it seems to require no effort, arising from the natural course of things (ziran, "self-so") rather than from the striving, calculating ego. The sage governs the state and the adept lives a life by wu wei, and the paradox the texts delight in is that this "not-doing" is supremely effective: as the Daodejing puts it, the Way "does nothing, yet nothing is left undone."
The classic images are drawn from skill and from nature. Water is the favoured emblem, it yields, takes the lowest place, and yet wears away rock and finds every gap. In the Zhuangzi, the cook Ding carves an ox for years without dulling his blade because he no longer hacks at it but lets the knife follow the joints and cavities already there; his mastery looks like effortlessness because he has stopped imposing himself on the material. Wu wei is that quality generalised: efficacy without coercion, the removal of the interfering self so that action can flow from the grain of the world.
The Paradox of Trying Not to Try
The concept carries a difficulty the early Chinese thinkers themselves felt, which the sinologist Edward Slingerland has named the "paradox of wu wei": one cannot straightforwardly try to be effortless and spontaneous, because the trying is itself the forcing that wu wei is supposed to be free of. How does one make an effort to stop making an effort? This tension runs, on Slingerland's reading, through the whole of early Chinese philosophy and is not the property of Daoism alone.
Different schools resolve it differently, which is why wu wei is much argued over as to what exactly it excludes. The Confucian tradition seeks a spontaneity earned through long cultivation, Confucius could at seventy "follow what his heart desired without transgressing," a wu wei arrived at by decades of effortful learning. The Daoist texts are more inclined to distrust deliberate cultivation and to seek a return to an original naturalness that effort only obstructs. In its political register, wu wei became an ideal of rulership, the sovereign who governs best by interfering least, associated with the Huang-Lao statecraft of early imperial China, and in the inner-alchemical and meditative traditions it names the non-forcing stance of the practitioner. What it consistently excludes is not activity but coercive, ego-driven striving against the way things are.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Affirmed By
Belongs to Tradition
Acting without forcing, so action arises from the situation rather than the ego, is a shared Taoist ideal held by this dominant Quanzhen lineage.
Acting without forcing, so action arises from the situation rather than the ego, is a shared Taoist ideal pursued here through meditation and stillness.
Acting without forcing, so action arises from the situation rather than the ego, is a shared Taoist ideal held by this visionary tradition.
Acting without forcing, so action arises from the situation rather than the ego, is a shared Taoist ideal pursued here through ritual service to the community.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.