Enochian Calls
The Third Call
Also Known As Third Call
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1584
The Third Call is one of sixteen calls in John Dee's Claves Angelicae used to work the angels of the four Elemental Watchtowers, earth, water, air and fire, received through Edward Kelley in 1584 and published in Meric Casaubon's 1659 edition of Dee's spiritual diaries. Dee's own angelic informant, Illemese, describes the nineteen calls together as entrances into the knowledge of the mystical tables. It falls between the two general opening calls and the nineteenth call, which is recited with the name of whichever of the thirty Aethyrs is worked.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1584 1Tradition: John Dee and Edward Kelley's angelic sessions Origin Period1888 to 1900 2Tradition: Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Origin PeriodReceived at Krakow between 13 April and 13 July 1584 1 Origin PeriodTaken into the Second Order material of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn from 1888, three centuries after Dee 2 Place of OriginKrakow, where Dee and Kelley were resident under Albert Laski's patronage in 1584 1 Attributed Author / CompilerEdward Kelley scried and spoke the text; John Dee wrote it down as it came 1 Attributed Author / CompilerJohn Dee made the fair copy and gave the calls their numbering 3 Attributed Author / CompilerNo independent witness to the sessions exists 4 Origin of the NameAn English descriptive title rather than a received name. Dee numbered the keys as they came and the atlas names each by its number; the Enochian text itself carries no title of its own. 3 Transmission
Manuscript TraditionIt is not in Sloane MS 3188 or Sloane MS 3189. Those two hold the earlier sessions, from 22 December 1581 to 30 May 1583, and the clean copy of the Liber Loagaeth, and they close a full year before the Calls were received. A reader told that the Dee material is in 3188 and 3189 has been given the wrong shelfmark for this text. 3 Manuscript TraditionThe record of the sessions in which it was received was printed by Meric Casaubon in 1659, seventy-five years after the event, which is how the Calls reached a public readership at all. 1 Manuscript TraditionThe text stands in British Library Sloane MS 3191, in John Dee's own hand, in the fair copy headed 48 Claves Angelicae and dated at Krakow between 13 April and 13 July 1584. The same manuscript volume carries De Heptarchia Mystica and Liber Scientiae. 3 Sources
Primary SourceClaves Angelicae, received through Edward Kelley in 1584, printed in Meric Casaubon's edition of 1659. 1 Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryA modern system making claims scholarship never entertained; it never held scholarly standing 4 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceDee's angelic informant Illemese describes the nineteen calls together as entrances into the knowledge of the mystical tables. 1 Meaning in the Attesting SourceDee's record places this among the calls addressed to the tables, rather than among the two general keys that open the sequence. 1 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThe Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn took the Calls into its Second Order material from 1888, and Aleister Crowley worked them from 1900, three centuries after Dee. Most of what is asserted about the Calls today, including their elemental attributions and their correspondences on the Tree of Life, belongs to those two bodies of work and is not in the Dee manuscripts. 5 Learn More
The Third Call And The Four Elemental Watchtowers
The Third Call is one of sixteen calls in John Dee's Claves Angelicae used to work the angels of the four Elemental Watchtowers, earth, water, air and fire, received through the scryer Edward Kelley in 1584 and published in Meric Casaubon's 1659 edition of Dee's spiritual diaries. Dee's own angelic informant, named Illemese in the sessions, describes the nineteen calls together as entrances into the knowledge of the mystical tables. It opens the sequence of sixteen, immediately after the two general calls in the fixed sequence, the manuscript's own ordering rather than an editorial choice.
The four Watchtowers are the Great Tables of Dee's system, one for each classical element, each populated with its own hierarchy of angelic names read off a grid Dee recorded from the angels letter by letter. The sixteen calls of this middle group are the corpus's working tools for that hierarchy as a whole; Casaubon's 1659 edition prints them consecutively, in the same parallel format of angelic text and English gloss used for the rest of the forty eight keys, without further subdividing them by individual tablet in the base text itself.
Because this is a single closely grouped set drawn from one manuscript tradition, the sixteen calls share the bulk of their documented history: the same 1584 reception date, the same scryer, and the same first printing. What distinguishes The Third Call from its neighbors is chiefly its position in that fixed sequence, third in the group of sixteen, rather than any separately attested content of its own.
Casaubon's Printing And Later Use Of The Third Call
Meric Casaubon's 1659 A True and Faithful Relation of What Passed for Many Years Between Dr. John Dee and Some Spirits is the source through which The Third Call, like the rest of the Claves Angelicae, reached readers outside Dee's own household. Casaubon printed the angelic text beside Dee's English gloss, and it is that parallel printing, not a surviving independent manuscript, that has carried the sixteen elemental calls into every later edition.
The Golden Dawn's Enochian curriculum, documented in Israel Regardie's published editions of the order's teaching, drew on this middle group of sixteen calls for working the four Watchtowers ceremonially, a use several centuries removed from Dee's own sixteenth century sessions with Kelley. Later ceremonial interest in the Claves Angelicae has concentrated more heavily on the nineteenth call, the single text recited thirty times with the name of each Aethyr, popularized above all by Aleister Crowley's 1911 Vision and the Voice; The Third Call and its fifteen companion calls remain comparatively less written about in that later literature, tied instead to the elemental structure of the four Watchtowers rather than to the thirty Aethyrs.
No independent manuscript tradition exists to check Casaubon's transcription of The Third Call against, which is why every modern discussion of the call, this one included, ultimately rests on the same seventeenth century printing.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.