Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Figures

Cheng Yi

Also Known As Cheng I (Chinese) The Wade-Giles romanisation. · Yichuan (Chinese) The style name his commentary on the Changes is known by.
Sages

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Cheng Yi, with his elder brother Cheng Hao, is one of the founding thinkers of Song Neo-Confucianism, and it is his branch of the two that Zhu Xi took up and systematised, which is why the resulting orthodoxy is called the Cheng-Zhu school. He held that everything has its li, its pattern or principle, that the li of all things is finally one, and that the way to it is the investigation of things, the phrase from the Great Learning that he read as sustained study of the particular until the pattern is grasped. His commentary on the Book of Changes reads the hexagrams as moral and political situations rather than as prognostications, and it is one of the most influential readings the text has had. Severe in manner and repeatedly in political trouble, he was proscribed late in life, and his teaching became state orthodoxy only long after his death in 1107.

Facts
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
1033 to 1107 1
Office Held
He served for a time as classics lecturer to the boy emperor Zhezong at court, a position of real influence that placed him at the center of the factional politics between reformist and conservative officials, politics that later cost him the post and led to his proscription. 2
Identity
Gender
Male 1
History
Historical Note
With his brother Cheng Hao he set the terms of the Neo-Confucian argument that Zhu Xi later drew into a system. 1
Position Profile
Key Text
Commentary on the Book of Changes 1
Terminology
Term Coined
His formula the investigation of things, reinterpreting a phrase from the Confucian classic the Great Learning as sustained study of particulars until their underlying principle is grasped, became one of the most contested phrases in later Neo-Confucian philosophy, argued over for centuries by thinkers including Zhu Xi and, later, Wang Yangming, who read it in an opposing, more intuitive sense. 2
Status
Status Within the Tradition
His distinction between principle, li, and material force, qi, became foundational to the Cheng-Zhu school of Neo-Confucianism that Zhu Xi later systematized, though scholarship continues to debate how far Zhu Xi's synthesis reflects his own emphasis rather than that of his elder brother Cheng Hao. 2
Practice
Lineage
Alongside his elder brother Cheng Hao, he is counted among the founding figures of the Cheng-Zhu school of Neo-Confucianism, whose synthesis of classical Confucian ethics and metaphysics Zhu Xi would later systematize into the Song dynasty's dominant intellectual tradition. 2
Learn More
Principle, Nature, and the Investigation of Things

Cheng Yi's system rests on a pair of terms. Li is pattern or principle, the way a thing ought to be and the reason it is as it is; qi is the psychophysical stuff that any actual thing is made of. Everything that exists has both. The li of a thing is perfect and is continuous with the li of everything else, so that in his formula there is one principle with many particularisations. Qi is what varies in clarity and density, and it is where imperfection, obstruction and bad character come from.

From this he draws the claim that made his branch of the school distinctive: the nature is principle. Human nature as such is good without qualification, and what is actually observed in a person is nature refracted through their endowment of qi. Moral cultivation is therefore not the manufacture of virtue but the clearing of an obstruction.

The practice has two halves and he insisted on both. One is the investigation of things, a phrase from the Great Learning that he read as patient and repeated study of particular matters, texts, affairs, natural things, until the pattern common to them is grasped; he explicitly denied that one could exhaust all things and said that sustained work on many eventually opens out. The other is abiding in reverence, a settled inward composure maintained in ordinary activity rather than in withdrawal.

His brother Cheng Hao had emphasised the direct apprehension of unity with all things. Cheng Yi's slower, more analytic route is the one Zhu Xi took up, and it is the reason the resulting orthodoxy is named for the two of them.

A Commentary on the Changes That Declines to Predict

Cheng Yi worked on his commentary on the Book of Changes for much of his life and finished it late, and it takes a deliberate position on what the book is for. The hexagram is read as a situation, its six lines as positions within that situation, and the relations between lines as relations between persons in office: ruler and minister, senior and junior, the man in the wrong place at the wrong time. What the text tells you is how a person of integrity should conduct themselves in the configuration described. It does not tell you what will happen.

That reading effectively removed divination from a divination manual, and Zhu Xi, who took over almost everything else from him, would not follow him here. Zhu Xi wrote his own commentary restoring the Changes to its original use as a book of prognostication, while keeping Cheng Yi's metaphysics of principle. The two commentaries were later printed together, so that generations of examination candidates read the moral and the divinatory readings side by side.

His political career ran the other way from his influence. He was tutor to the young emperor Zhezong, and his severity in that post made enemies; when the reform faction returned to power he was stripped of office, banished to Fuzhou in 1097, and his teaching was proscribed, with his followers forbidden to study under him. He died in 1107 under that ban.

Roughly two centuries later, in 1313, the Cheng and Zhu commentaries were made the basis of the civil service examinations, and stayed there until the examinations were abolished in 1905.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Cheng Yi directly: "of Three Scholars: Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, and Zhu Xi," a hanging scroll attributed to Liu Minshu, Yuan dynasty, thirteenth to fourteenth century, ink and color on silk in the baimiao line style."

Belongs to Tradition

Depicted In

The Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art's own title for this Yuan-dynasty scroll names Cheng Yi as one of the three Neo Confucian scholars portrayed.

Originated In

China, Regions

Sibling Of

Source Neo-Confucianism in HistoryPeter K. Bol

Studied

Confucius, Figures
I Ching, Disciplines

His commentary reads the hexagrams as moral and political situations rather than as prognostications.

Cheng Yi and his elder brother Cheng Hao both studied briefly under Zhou Dunyi in their youth, an encounter Zhu Xi later treated as the origin point of the Cheng-Zhu lineage.

Source Neo-Confucianism in HistoryPeter K. Bol

Studied By

Zhu Xi, Figures

Zhu Xi took up and systematised his branch of the two brothers, which is why the orthodoxy is called the Cheng-Zhu school.

Sources
1. Sources of Chinese Tradition, Volume 1
Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom (eds), Columbia University Press, 1999View the Source
2. Neo-Confucianism in History
Peter K. Bol, Harvard University Asia Center, 2008
Reflections on Things at Hand: The Neo-Confucian Anthology Compiled by Chu Hsi and Lu Tsu-Ch'ien
Zhu Xi and Lu Zuqian, trans. Wing-tsit Chan, Columbia University Press, 1967
The I Ching, or Book of Changes
Richard Wilhelm (trans.); Cary F. Baynes (English trans.), Princeton University Press, 1980View the Source
Zhouyi: The Book of Changes
Richard Rutt (trans.), Curzon Press, 1996View the Source
Portraits of Three Scholars, National Museum of Asian Art (F1916.584)
Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art (Freer Gallery of Art)Depicted In: Portraits of Three Scholars: Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, and Zhu Xi (National Museum of Asian Art), Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art F1916.584View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.