Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Arius

Clergy, Theologians & Religious Officials

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Arius was a priest in Alexandria whose teaching that the Son was a created being, not co-eternal or of one substance with the Father, provoked the controversy that the First Council of Nicaea was convened to resolve in 325. Condemned there and again in 381 at Constantinople, his position gave its name to Arianism, a Christology that persisted among Germanic kingdoms for centuries after the imperial church rejected it.

Facts
Disputed
Lifespan or Floruit
256 to 336 CE 1
The source gives this year as about, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.
Theology
Held that the Son was begotten by the will of the Father and therefore not co-eternal or of one substance with him, so that, in his own phrase, there was when the Son was not. 3
Athanasius of Alexandria's Orations Against the Arians, written to refute Arius's teaching, is the source through which Arius's position survives at all, since none of his own writings survive except as fragments quoted by hostile opponents. The council that met at Nicaea in 325 CE to judge the dispute, working from summaries of Arius's teaching that the Son was a created being rather than eternally divine, ruled against him and affirmed instead that the Son is homoousios, of one substance with the Father, co-eternal and uncreated. Because Arius's own sustained argument does not survive independently of Athanasius's rebuttal, his theology is known chiefly through the hostile summary the council was judging rather than through his own words, which is why the two positions are named as the Arian and Nicene camps of a controversy whose losing side is preserved only in quotation.
How Its Legacy Is Contested
Almost nothing Arius (about 256 to 336) wrote survives except as quoted by the opponents who had him condemned at Nicaea in 325 and again at Constantinople in 381, so his actual position, as the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) notes, has to be reconstructed from hostile witnesses rather than his own words. 1
Identity
Gender
Male 2
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
About 256 to 336 1
Place of Activity
Alexandria, then exile after Nicaea; died at Constantinople. 2
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Origins
Place of Origin
Libya, in the region of Cyrenaica (later tradition narrows this to the city of Ptolemais specifically, though that detail rests on inference rather than direct ancient testimony) 1
Learn More
The Alexandrian Priest and His Teaching

Arius served as a presbyter at Baucalis, one of the parish churches of Alexandria, under Bishop Alexander, and taught that only God the Father is unbegotten, without beginning and without source. The Son, in Arius's account, is the Father's first and greatest creation, brought into being before all ages to serve as the agent of the rest of creation, but not co-eternal with the Father and not of the same substance. His own summary line, preserved only because opponents quoted it to condemn it, was blunt: there was when the Son was not.

The stakes were not abstract. If the Son is a creature, however exalted, then what unites humanity to God in Christ is itself something less than full divinity, and salvation rests on shakier ground than the church at large was prepared to accept. Bishop Alexander deposed Arius locally around 321, but Arius had allies among influential bishops in the East, chiefly Eusebius of Nicomedia, and the dispute spread through the empire's Christian communities quickly enough that the emperor Constantine, only recently converted and eager for a unified church, called a general council to settle it.

Almost nothing survives in Arius's own voice. His letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia and fragments of a verse work called the Thalia, meant to popularize his teaching in a form ordinary people could sing, are preserved only inside the writings of the opponents who quoted them to refute them, chiefly Athanasius, who spent much of his career as Alexander's successor prosecuting the case against him.

Nicaea, Exile and the Long Afterlife of Arianism

Constantine convened bishops from across the empire at Nicaea in 325. The council produced a creed declaring the Son homoousios with the Father, of one substance, co-eternal and uncreated, directly rejecting Arius's teaching, and Arius himself was exiled. The condemnation did not end the argument. Constantine later readmitted Arius to communion under pressure from his Eastern allies, and for the better part of the fourth century the empire's bishops split repeatedly over rival creeds, exiles and reinstatements that tracked the shifting sympathies of successive emperors rather than a settled theological consensus. Arius died in Constantinople in 336, and the wider controversy that carried his name was not closed until the First Council of Constantinople in 381 reaffirmed and extended the Nicene formula.

Arian Christianity did not simply disappear with that ruling. Ulfilas, a fourth century Gothic bishop trained in the Eastern church during the years Arian theology held real influence there, translated scripture into Gothic and evangelized the Goths in a non-Nicene form of Christianity that spread with them into the Vandal, Lombard and Visigothic kingdoms, persisting in parts of Western Europe for two more centuries after Nicaea and Constantinople had settled the question for the imperial church.

Modern scholarship treats the label "Arianism" with some caution. Because Arius's own writings survive only as fragments embedded in hostile sources, and because later figures such as Eunomius pushed subordinationist Christology further than Arius himself is known to have gone, historians debate how far the developed "Arian" theology of the following decades should be read back onto Arius the man rather than onto a movement that grew past him.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Rejected Here

His teaching on the Son was the question the council was convened to judge; he was condemned and exiled.

Associated With

Arianism, Doctrines

Arius is the Alexandrian presbyter the position is named after.

Trinity, Doctrines
Source Orations Against the AriansAthanasius of Alexandria

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
2. The Ecclesiastical History (Historia Ecclesiastica)
Eusebius of Caesarea, 325
3. Orations Against the Arians
Athanasius of Alexandria
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.