Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Godfrey of Bouillon

Rulers, Emperors & Monarchs

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A Frankish nobleman, Duke of Lower Lotharingia, who mortgaged much of his patrimony to finance his departure and became one of the principal leaders of the First Crusade. He commanded troops at the sieges of Nicaea, Antioch and Jerusalem, and after Jerusalem's fall on 15 July 1099 was chosen to rule the newly conquered territory. He declined the title of king in the city where Christ wore a crown of thorns, taking instead the title Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, Advocate of the Holy Sepulchre. He died within the year, in July 1100, and was succeeded by his brother Baldwin of Boulogne, who did take the royal title as Baldwin I of Jerusalem.

Facts
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
1060 to 1100 1
Office Held
Duke of Lower Lotharingia; ruler of the Kingdom of Jerusalem under the title Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, Advocate of the Holy Sepulchre, 1099 to 1100. 1
Origins
Place of Origin
Most historians favor Boulogne-sur-Mer, in the county of Boulogne, though a thirteenth century chronicle names Baisy, in Brabant, instead. 1
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Identity
Gender
Male 1
Learn More
A Mortgaged Duchy Funds a March to Jerusalem

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Godfrey of Bouillon, a Frankish nobleman and Duke of Lower Lotharingia, mortgaged much of his own patrimony to finance his departure on the First Crusade, a financial sacrifice that placed him among the expedition's principal leaders from its outset. Historians favor Boulogne sur Mer, in the county of Boulogne, as his birthplace, though a thirteenth century chronicle instead names Baisy, in Brabant, an uncertainty that persists even about a man whose later actions in the East are unusually well documented.

Godfrey commanded troops through three of the crusade's defining engagements, the sieges of Nicaea, Antioch and finally Jerusalem itself. His role across that whole campaign, from the opening siege in Anatolia to the culminating assault on the holy city, placed him among the handful of nobles whose military leadership carried the expedition to its stated goal, a campaign that spanned several years and thousands of miles from Lotharingia to the walls of Jerusalem.

After Jerusalem fell to the crusaders on 15 July 1099, the leadership that remained in the city chose Godfrey to rule the newly conquered territory, a recognition of the standing his sustained command through the campaign's hardest fighting had earned him among his fellow crusade leaders, several of whom, including Bohemond of Taranto, had by then already claimed territories of their own along the crusade's route.

He Declined a Crown Where Christ Wore Thorns

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Chosen to rule Jerusalem after its capture in 1099, Godfrey of Bouillon declined the title of king, reasoning that he would not wear a crown of gold in the city where Christ had worn a crown of thorns. He took instead the more modest title Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, Advocate of the Holy Sepulchre, a style that framed his rule as guardianship of the holy sites rather than royal sovereignty over them, a distinction that mattered a great deal to a nobleman who had mortgaged his own patrimony to reach the city in the first place.

That restraint did not last beyond his own lifetime. Godfrey died within the year, in July 1100, cutting short whatever the Advocate title might have become as a lasting form of rule for the new Christian territory in the Levant. His death came less than a year after the conquest his own command through Nicaea, Antioch and Jerusalem had helped secure, leaving the new territory's form of government still unsettled.

He was succeeded by his brother, Baldwin of Boulogne, who made no equivalent gesture and took the full royal title as Baldwin I of Jerusalem, becoming the first king to rule the territory that Godfrey's own conquest, and his own refusal to be called king, had made possible. The kingdom that followed kept Godfrey's conquest but abandoned the more modest title he had chosen for it.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Antioch, Cities

This source names Antioch directly: "He commanded troops at the sieges of Nicaea, Antioch and Jerusalem, and after Jerusalem's fall on 15 July 1099 was chosen to rule the newly conquered territory."

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman
Jerusalem, Cities

This source names Jerusalem directly: "He commanded troops at the sieges of Nicaea, Antioch and Jerusalem, and after Jerusalem's fall on 15 July 1099 was chosen to rule the newly conquered territory."

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman
Nicaea, Cities

This source names Nicaea directly: "He commanded troops at the sieges of Nicaea, Antioch and Jerusalem, and after Jerusalem's fall on 15 July 1099 was chosen to rule the newly conquered territory."

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman

Belongs to Tradition

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman

Related To

Sources
1. God's War: A New History of the Crusades
Christopher Tyerman, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.