Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Karen Horney

Scientists, Physicians & Natural Philosophers

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

German born American psychoanalyst who broke from orthodox Freudian theory to found a Neo-Freudian school emphasizing culture and social relationships over instinctual drive, and whose late career interest in Zen Buddhism, developed through her friendship with D. T. Suzuki and a 1952 study trip to Japanese monasteries, remains a documented but unfinished intersection between Western psychoanalysis and Buddhist thought, cut short by her death the same year.

Facts
Origins
Place of OriginSourced to the subject's own account
Near Hamburg, Germany 1
FounderSourced to the subject's own account
Co-founder and dean, American Institute for Psychoanalysis (1941) 1
Defining Moment
Traveled to Japan in the summer of 1952, at D. T. Suzuki's invitation, to visit major Zen monasteries; died months later without completing her intended synthesis of Zen and psychoanalysis 2
Identity
Also Known AsSourced to the subject's own account
Karen Danielsen (birth name) 1
GenderSourced to the subject's own account
Female 1
Attestation
HistoricitySourced to the subject's own account
Historically attested 1
Life
Lifespan or FloruitSourced to the subject's own account
1885 to 1952 1
Learn More
From Orthodox Freudian to Neo-Freudian

Karen Horney, born Karen Danielsen on 16 September 1885 near Hamburg, Germany, trained in medicine and then in orthodox Freudian psychoanalysis in Berlin during the 1910s and 1920s, becoming a practicing analyst and teacher within the mainstream psychoanalytic establishment. She emigrated to the United States in 1932, first to Chicago and then to New York, where her growing disagreement with core elements of Freudian theory, particularly its emphasis on innate biological drive over social and cultural context, and its account of feminine psychology built around the concept of penis envy, brought her into open conflict with the psychoanalytic institutions she had trained within.

That conflict led to her formal expulsion from the New York Psychoanalytic Institute in 1941 for what her orthodox colleagues considered unacceptable theoretical deviation, after which she helped found the rival American Institute for Psychoanalysis the same year, becoming its dean and continuing to develop what became known as Neo-Freudian or culturalist psychoanalysis for the rest of her career. She died in New York on 4 December 1952.

Her 1926 to 1937 papers challenging Freud's account of feminine psychology, later collected as Feminine Psychology, argued that supposed female traits Freud attributed to biological drive were better explained by the specific social and cultural position women occupied, an argument that anticipated by decades the feminist critiques of psychoanalysis that became prominent later in the twentieth century.

A Late Turn Toward Zen

In the final years of her life Horney developed a serious interest in Zen Buddhism, drawn to what she read as parallels between the Zen concept of a person's true, unconditioned nature and her own psychoanalytic theory of the real self obscured by neurotic self-alienation. She corresponded with and met the scholar D. T. Suzuki, the most influential interpreter of Zen Buddhism to a Western audience in the twentieth century, first in New York during his 1950 to 1951 lecture tour and citing his work in her final two books.

In the summer of 1952 Horney traveled to Japan at Suzuki's invitation to visit major Zen monasteries directly, a trip she undertook as the practical culmination of that deepening intellectual and personal interest. She returned to New York and was diagnosed with cancer soon afterward, dying only months later, before she had the opportunity to develop the Zen-psychoanalysis synthesis her late writing and travel suggest she was working toward. The atlas records this documented but genuinely unfinished intersection honestly, as an interrupted direction rather than a completed body of thought.

Horney's own late writing, including Neurosis and Human Growth (1950), had already developed a concept of the real self obscured by compulsive, anxiety driven strategies of the neurotic personality, a framework she and later commentators, including Suzuki's own collaborator Richard De Martino, read as strikingly close to Zen Buddhism's account of an authentic nature obscured by grasping and illusion, even though the two traditions had developed the idea independently of one another.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Karen Horney directly: "the depth psychology of Carl Jung and Karen Horney."

Source Alan Watts (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors

Trained in orthodox Freudian psychoanalysis before breaking from Freud's theory, most notably his account of feminine psychology, to found the Neo-Freudian culturalist school.

Source Karen Horney (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Sources
1. Karen Horney (reference article)
Wikipedia contributorsView the Source
2. Karen Horney, Daisetz T. Suzuki, and Zen Buddhism
Richard De Martino, The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1991
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.