A prophet of the Banu Hanifa in al-Yamama, in the oases of central Arabia, who claimed revelation in the same years as Muhammad and led his people in the wars that followed the Prophet's death. Islamic sources call him Musaylima al-Kadhdhab, the liar, and even the name by which he is known is a diminutive his opponents used. He was killed at the battle of Aqraba in 632 or 633, when the forces sent by Abu Bakr broke the Hanifa. Nothing he taught survives except as quotation inside the writings of the people who defeated him, which is a serious problem for anyone trying to say what his movement actually was.
Facts
Open Questions
Lifespan or FloruitNo source records when Musaylima was born. Everything known about him comes from the testimony of the people who defeated him, Islamic accounts written after his death at the battle of Aqraba in 632 or 633, which are concerned with his revelation, his following among the Banu Hanifa and his death, not with his early life. The marker recorded here reflects only a conventional placement in the same generation as Muhammad, whose approximate birth date it echoes, not any record of Musaylima's own birth. How Its Legacy Is ContestedWhat he actually preached cannot be recovered. Every reported revelation of his survives only as quotation inside the writings of the tradition that defeated him, and no manuscript, inscription or outside notice offers a control. 2 This is not a case of scholars holding rival readings of one body of evidence. There is no independent evidence at all, so no position is held. Life
Lifespan or FloruitKilled at the battle of Aqraba in 632 or 633. No birth year is recorded. 2 Manner of Death Manner of Death DetailKilled in the fighting at Aqraba, in the walled garden the sources afterwards called the garden of death. 1 Disputed
Lifespan or FloruitHe was killed at the battle of Aqraba, which Islamic sources place in either 632 or 633 CE depending on the reckoning of the campaign calendar used; the earlier year is recorded here as the more commonly cited one. Attestation
HistoricityA real leader of the Banu Hanifa, killed in the campaign at al-Yamama. The event is attested across the early Islamic historical tradition, which is unanimous about the war and unreliable about the man. Origins
Place of OriginAl-Yamama, in the oases of central Arabia, among the Banu Hanifa 2 Origin of the NameMusaylima is a diminutive form used by his opponents. Muslim scholars themselves recorded that his own people used the fuller name Maslama. 2 Learn More
The Prophet the Sources Set out to Refute
Musaylima is the best attested of the several people who claimed prophetic revelation in Arabia in the years around 630, and he is also the one about whom almost nothing independent survives. His people, the Banu Hanifa, held the oases of al-Yamama in the centre of the peninsula, a productive agricultural district rather than a marginal one, and they were numerous enough to field an army that very nearly held.
The sources are the problem. Everything that reaches us about his teaching comes through Muslim historians and commentators writing from a century to three centuries later, in a tradition for which he is the type of the false prophet. His name is transmitted in a diminutive form, and Muslim scholars themselves recorded that his own people used the fuller name Maslama. Passages presented as his revelations are quoted in a manner designed to make them ridiculous beside the Quran, and no manuscript, inscription or non-Muslim notice offers a control.
This does not make him a fiction. The campaign against him is among the best documented events of the period, and the losses among Quran reciters at Aqraba are given in the tradition as the reason the collection of the Quran was undertaken at all. What cannot be recovered from the surviving record is the content of what he actually preached, and an honest account has to say so rather than repeat the parody.
Al-Yamama and the Wars of Apostasy
When Muhammad died in 632 several Arabian groupings withdrew from the arrangement they had made with Medina. Muslim historiography calls the campaigns that followed the ridda, the apostasy, a term that assumes the arrangement had been a conversion rather than a treaty. Modern historians point out that some of the groups involved may have understood themselves to be ending a political agreement with a man who was now dead, not leaving a religion, and that the two readings are not always separable in the sources.
The Banu Hanifa were the hardest of them to break. Abu Bakr sent Khalid ibn al-Walid, and the decisive engagement was fought at Aqraba, in a walled garden that the sources afterwards called the garden of death. The Hanifa lost and Musaylima was killed in the fighting. The tradition gives the fatal blow to Wahshi ibn Harb, the same man who had killed Hamza at Uhud years earlier while fighting on the other side, a detail whose neatness invites caution.
The consequence that mattered ran in the opposite direction from the battle. Casualties among the men who carried the Quran in memory were heavy enough, the sources say, for Umar to press Abu Bakr to have the text written down and gathered before more of it was lost. On that account the collection of the Quran as a single written object begins with the campaign that ended Musaylima.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
He claimed prophethood in his own right. The whole record of him is in the Muslim sources that call him al-Kadhdhab, the liar, and nothing he composed survives except as quoted by his opponents.
This source names Musaylima directly: "to prophethood, most prominently Musaylima in the Yamama region."
Of the Banu Hanifa in al-Yamama, in the centre of the Arabian peninsula.
Sources
Open Questions (2 open questions)
When was Musaylima born?
Everything known about Musaylima comes from the testimony of the people who defeated him, Islamic accounts written after his death at the battle of Aqraba in 632 or 633, concerned with his revelation, his following among the Banu Hanifa and his death rather than his early life. No source records when he was born.
What would resolve this A source independent of the Islamic accounts that defeated and denounced him, from within the Banu Hanifa's own oral or documentary memory, naming a birth year or generation for Musaylima.
Early Islamic history, pre-Islamic Arabian historyP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.), The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition
What did Musaylima actually preach?
Every reported revelation of his survives only as quotation inside the writings of the tradition that defeated him, presented in order to be ridiculed, and no manuscript, inscription or non-Muslim notice offers a control. This is a gap rather than a dispute: no scholar holds a position on the content of his teaching, because there is nothing independent to hold a position about.
What would resolve this A documentary or epigraphic find from al-Yamama independent of the Islamic historiographical tradition, or an early non-Muslim notice of the Hanifa movement of the 630s.
Arabian epigraphy and early Islamic historiographyP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.), The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.