Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Koshas

Wisdom Sheath

vig-yah-nah-MY-ah

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 700 to 900 CE

The Wisdom Sheath, Vijnanamaya Kosha in Sanskrit, is the fourth of the five koshas, or sheaths, that Vedantic philosophy describes as layered around the innermost self, a model first set out in the ancient Taittiriya Upanishad, likely composed in the middle of the first millennium BCE. It is described as the sheath of intellect, discernment and higher wisdom, sitting between the Manomaya Kosha, the sheath of the ordinary thinking mind, and the Anandamaya Kosha, the innermost sheath of bliss, and it is this layer that Vedanta credits with the capacity for judgement, decision and spiritual discrimination. The five koshas as a whole move from the grossest to the subtlest, beginning with the Annamaya Kosha, the physical body sustained by food, and the Wisdom Sheath sits second from the innermost, more subtle than mind but not yet the direct experience of bliss. Unlike the physical and vital sheaths below it, the Wisdom Sheath and the two above it are understood in this tradition to survive the death of the physical body, persisting as part of the subtler bodies Vedanta describes.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
700 to 900 CE 1Tradition: Advaita Vedanta
Origin Period
700 BCE to 500 BCE 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Origin Period
Named in the Taittiriya Upanishad in the middle of the first millennium BCE, and given its systematic five-sheath treatment within Advaita Vedanta by the eighth or ninth century CE. 2
Place of Origin
The Vedic schools of northern India. 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Attributed Author / Compiler
None. The Taittiriya Upanishad belongs to the Taittiriya school of the Black Yajurveda and is anonymous; no author is claimed for it by the tradition or assigned to it by scholarship. 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Origin of the Name
Each name is literally "the sheath made of X", so the scheme is a series of containers and not a series of bodies 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Origin of the Name
Kosha is Sanskrit for a sheath, case or scabbard, and -maya is a suffix meaning made of 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Language
Vedic Sanskrit 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Vijnanamaya, made of understanding: vijnana, discernment and judgement, which the text places nearer the self than the ordinary mind. 2Tradition: Taittiriya Upanishad
Status
Status Today
Living tradition, practised today 3
Learn More
Vijnanamaya, the Wisdom Sheath

Vijnanamaya kosha is the fourth of the five sheaths of Vedantic thought, the sheath made of wisdom or intellect, vijnana or buddhi, the faculty of discernment, judgement, discrimination and higher understanding, as distinct from the restless processing mind of the sheath outside it. It lies within the mental sheath and is subtler than it, the layer of the intellect that decides, discriminates the real from the unreal, and carries the sense of the individual "I" as a knower.

In the nested scheme of the Taittiriya Upanishad this sheath is the seat of the discerning intelligence and of the will, closer to the self than the ordinary mind, and it is by refining this faculty of discrimination that the seeker distinguishes the atman from all that merely covers it. Within it lies only the sheath of bliss and, beyond that, the self. The five koshas are the classical Vedantic model of the layered person, and the wisdom sheath is the innermost but one. The doctrine is ancient and Indian.

Vijnanamaya and the Three Bodies Doctrine

Vedantic thought overlays the five koshas with a coarser scheme of three bodies, or sharira: the gross, sthula sharira, the subtle, sukshma sharira, and the causal, karana sharira. Vijnanamaya, the wisdom sheath, belongs to the subtle body along with the vital and mental sheaths, distinct from Annamaya, the food sheath, which alone is identified with the gross body and left behind at death.

Because Vijnanamaya lies within the subtle body, the tradition holds it to persist beyond physical death, carrying the faculty of discernment forward until liberation dissolves both the subtle and causal bodies; this sheath is also given particular weight in Vedantic practice because it is the faculty said to be capable of recognising the difference between the true self and the sheaths that cover it, a recognition liberation itself depends on.

Vijnanamaya's role as discriminator sets it apart from Manomaya, the more reactive mental sheath just outside it: where Manomaya processes sensory input automatically, Vijnanamaya is held to judge and decide, the faculty of buddhi that a serious meditator is trained to strengthen against the pull of unconsidered reaction. Twentieth century Theosophical writers later adapted kosha vocabulary into a separately bounded scheme of subtle bodies, a distinct later Western system rather than a continuation of this Vedantic teaching.

Sources The Principal Upanishads with Rainbow Body: A History of the Western Chakra System from Blavatsky to BrennanKurt Leland

Cross-Tradition Connections

Originates in Language

Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume III: Advaita Vedanta up to Samkara and His Pupils
Karl H. Potter (ed.), Motilal Banarsidass, 1981On the Vedantic analysis of the pancha-kosha as coverings of the self rather than the selfView the Source
2. The Early Upanisads: Annotated Text and Translation
Patrick Olivelle, Oxford University Press, 1998introductionView the Source
3. An Introduction to Hinduism
Gavin Flood, Cambridge University Press, 1996on Vedanta as a living tradition of teachingView the Source
The Principal Upanishads
Harper, 1953Taittiriya Upanishad, Brahmananda Valli, on the five sheaths from the food-sheath (annamaya) to the bliss-sheath (anandamaya) veiling the atmanView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.