Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Languages

Modern German

Sacred & Content Languages

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

German as a language of composition, as distinct from the site's German interface locale. Named Modern German rather than German because the atlas records historical registers separately. Modern German is the one to cite for material composed in German, including Guido von List's Armanen runic system (1906 to 1908) and the German terminology of Paracelsian elemental and alchemical thought.

Facts
Origins
Language Family
West Germanic branch of the Indo-European language family; the content-language counterpart to the site's German interface locale, reserved for material genuinely composed in German. 2
Place of Origin
Modern German originated in the German-speaking lands of Central Europe, standardized above all through Martin Luther's sixteenth-century Bible translation into a chancery dialect of eastern Central Germany. 2
Practice
Liturgical and Scriptural Role
Cited where German is named as a language of composition for Armanen runes, alchemical principles, elementals and esoteric texts, including Guido von List's 1906-1908 Armanen runic system. 3
Identity
Native Script
The Latin alphabet with umlaut and the eszett, in roman type since Fraktur was abandoned for official printing in 1941. 1
Learn More
German as a Language of Esoteric Composition

Modern German belongs, with English, to the West Germanic branch of the Indo-European family, and it carries one of the densest bodies of original religious and esoteric writing in Europe.

The Reformation made it a scriptural language. Luther's Bible did not only translate; it fixed a written standard that later German religious writing was composed in. Alongside it ran a mystical tradition with a vocabulary of its own, Meister Eckhart preaching in Middle High German, and Jakob Bohme writing in the early seventeenth century in a German so idiosyncratic that his translators still disagree over it.

The esoteric line is equally German rather than translated. Paracelsus wrote and lectured in German on alchemy and medicine, and the names of the elemental spirits, sylphs, undines, salamanders and gnomes, come out of that milieu rather than from a classical source. The Rosicrucian manifestos of the early seventeenth century appeared in German. Guido von List published his Armanen runic system in German in 1906 and 1908, and it passed from there into the volkisch and later the Nazi-era occult milieu in the same language.

For all of that material the question of what language it was written in has one answer, and it is not the language a modern reader happens to be holding it in. A German original and an English translation of it are two texts with two histories, and only one of them is evidence of what its author actually wrote.

Guido von List's Runic System and Paracelsian German Terminology

German-language esoteric writing is dominated by two bodies of material. The first is Guido von List's Armanen runic system, an eighteen-rune reinterpretation of the historical Younger Futhark published in German in 1906 and 1908, which became influential within twentieth century occultism and, more troublingly, within volkisch and Nazi-era esoteric ideology. List claimed the eighteen runes and their threefold interpretive method were revealed to him during an eleven-month period of blindness following cataract surgery, a personal account that later occultist readers and, separately, nationalist readers treated very differently from one another in the decades after his death in 1919.

The second is the German terminology of Paracelsian elemental and alchemical thought: the names given to the elemental spirits, sylphs, undines, salamanders and gnomes, and the alchemical tria prima of sulphur, mercury and salt as those concepts were discussed and transmitted in German rather than in Latin.

Earlier German Rosicrucian and mystical writing, including that of Jakob Bohme, belongs with them. What the three have in common is that the German is the original and not a rendering, so a disagreement over a term is a disagreement about what an author wrote rather than about what a translator chose. That is a different kind of argument, and a more settleable one.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Attested in Region

Modern German is documented in use as a written language in Western Europe. The claim is where the language is documented in use as a written, literary or liturgical language. It is not a claim about the full extent of its speakers, and it is not a claim about where the language originated.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Named or Composed in This Language

Source The Secrets of AlchemyLawrence M. Principe

Related To

German, Languages

The atlas holds German twice. This is the interface locale; Modern German is the content register, the language of Luther's Bible translation and of the mystical and Theosophical writing composed directly in German rather than translated into it.

Source Ethnologue: Languages of the WorldDavid M. Eberhard, Gary F. Simons and Charles D. Fennig (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
2. Ethnologue: Languages of the World
David M. Eberhard, Gary F. Simons and Charles D. Fennig (eds.), SIL International, 2024View the Source
3. The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Aquarian Press, 1985View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.