The Battle of Camlann is the final battle of the Arthurian legend, in which Arthur and Mordred kill each other and the fellowship of the Round Table comes to its end. The battle's earliest attestation is a bare entry in the Welsh Annales Cambriae, a chronicle compiled from earlier material in the tenth century, recording only that in a year usually reckoned as 537, the Battle of Camlann took place, in which Arthur and Medraut fell, with no account of cause, location or the two men's relationship to each other. Geoffrey of Monmouth's twelfth century Historia Regum Britanniae gives the battle its fuller literary shape: Arthur returns from campaigning against Rome to face Mordred's usurpation, and the two armies meet at a river called Camblam in Geoffrey's Latin, where Mordred is killed and Arthur is mortally wounded and carried away to the isle of Avalon to be healed of his wounds. Malory's fifteenth century Le Morte Darthur follows this shape closely, adding the detail, absent from Geoffrey, that the battle began by accident: a knight on one side draws his sword to kill an adder that has bitten him, and the flash of the blade in the sun is taken by both armies as a signal of attack, so that a war neither side intended breaks out from a single misread gesture.
Facts
History
Historical NoteMalory has Arthur kill Mordred with a spear thrust through the body, and Mordred, dying, drives his own sword into Arthur's head hard enough to deal the wound that later proves fatal, so that each king kills the other in the same exchange. 2 Historical NoteThe Annales Cambriae dates the battle to the year 537, or 539 in some manuscript recensions, a date scholars treat as no more reliable than the rest of the bare entry, since the annal's early dating system is itself a later reconstruction. 2 Historical NoteThe earliest source, a bare tenth century annal entry, is read by some historians as evidence of a real battle and by others as legend folded into a chronicle without independent verification; the debate is not settled. 3 Meaning
Central MotifA war neither side intended, triggered by a drawn sword meant only to kill a snake and mistaken by both armies for a signal of attack. 1 Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteCamlann itself is understood by place name scholars as a compound Welsh element, possibly meaning crooked bank, which by the twelfth century had already been attached to more than one real location across Britain and Cornwall, so that even the battle's site is unsettled independently of the question of whether it happened. 3 Scholarly NoteThe Annales Cambriae's bare entry, the strife of Camlann in which Arthur and Medraut fell, is the earliest reference and gives no cause, no site identification beyond the name, and does not even state that the two men fought each other. 3 Text
Source TextAnnales Cambriae, a tenth century Welsh chronicle, records the earliest bare mention; the fuller literary form comes from Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae and Thomas Malory's Le Morte Darthur. 2 Controversy
Point in DisputeGeoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, the source that fixed the battle's now standard shape, gives Mordred as Arthur's treacherous nephew, while some earlier Welsh material instead implies a more ambiguous kinship claim on the throne. 3 Sources
Primary SourceEarliest mention in the Annales Cambriae, a Welsh chronicle compiled in the tenth century from earlier material; given its fuller literary shape in Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae. 2 Learn More
A War That Began With a Snake
Malory's account of how the fighting at Camlann actually begins is one of the more quietly devastating details in the whole Arthurian legend. Arthur and Mordred have agreed to meet under truce to negotiate rather than fight, and Arthur, wary after a warning dream, orders his men that if any sword is drawn on either side, they are to attack at once, an instruction Mordred's side receives in mirror as well. During the parley an adder emerges from a bush and bites a knight on the foot; he draws his sword purely to kill the snake, with no thought of the truce at all, and the flash of steel catching the light is instantly read by both watching armies as the signal for treachery, and the battle neither leader wanted begins in earnest within moments. By the time the fighting ends, Malory tells us, all but four men on both sides lie dead on the field, among them nearly the entire remaining fellowship of the Round Table, a catastrophe brought about not by any grand betrayal in the moment itself but by an animal, a reflex, and two armies primed by suspicion to see attack in an innocent gesture. The scene gives the legend's climactic battle a bitterness no deliberate villainy could match: the kingdom does not fall to a plan, but to an accident neither side could have stopped once the truce's own precaution against treachery became the very thing that triggered it.
A Battle Historians Cannot Confirm or Dismiss
Camlann sits at the center of the wider historicity debate over King Arthur, and it illustrates the debate's limits as clearly as any single piece of evidence in the whole tradition. The Annales Cambriae entry that first names the battle was compiled in the tenth century from earlier material of uncertain reliability, several centuries after the year, usually reckoned as 537, that it assigns to the event, and no earlier source corroborates it independently. Historians arguing for a historical kernel behind the Arthur legend read the entry's very bareness as a point in its favor, a terse annal recording a real battle and a real casualty list with none of the literary elaboration a later inventor might have been tempted to add. Historians skeptical of any historical Arthur read the same bareness the opposite way, as evidence that a name and a battle circulating in oral legend were folded into a written chronicle without any independent verification of what, if anything, actually happened. Neither position can be conclusively settled from the evidence that survives, and the location itself, a place called Camlann or Camblam, has never been identified with confidence: proposed sites range from Cornwall to the Scottish borders, none of them supported by anything more than similarity of name or local tradition. Camlann remains, in the strict sense, an open question rather than a settled fact in either direction.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Returned to the lake by Sir Bedivere after the king is mortally wounded in this battle.
His final battle, where he receives the wound from which he is carried to Avalon.
The battle in which he and Arthur kill each other.
Rome, Cities This source names Rome directly: "returns from campaigning against Rome to face Mordred's usurpation, and the two armies meet at a river called Camblam in Geoffrey's Latin, where Mordred is killed and Arthur is mortally wounded and..."
Belongs to Tradition
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.