Home›Open Questions›Does the ganzfeld effect survive a pre-registered multi-laboratory replication meeting the standard set in the 1986 Hyman-Honorton communique?Open QuestionsDoes the ganzfeld effect survive a pre-registered multi-laboratory replication meeting the standard set in the 1986 Hyman-Honorton communique?Citation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Does the ganzfeld effect survive a pre-registered multi-laboratory replication meeting the standard set in the 1986 Hyman-Honorton communique?." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/open-questions-index/does-the-ganzfeld-effect-survive-a-pre-registered-multi-laboratory-replication-meeting-the-standard-set-in-the-1986-hyman-honorton-communique.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Does the ganzfeld effect survive a pre-registered multi-laboratory replication meeting the standard set in the 1986 Hyman-Honorton communique?. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/open-questions-index/does-the-ganzfeld-effect-survive-a-pre-registered-multi-laboratory-replication-meeting-the-standard-set-in-the-1986-hyman-honorton-communiqueCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-does-the-ganzfeld-effect-survive-a-pre-r, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Does the ganzfeld effect survive a pre-registered multi-laboratory replication meeting the standard set in the 1986 Hyman-Honorton communique?}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/open-questions-index/does-the-ganzfeld-effect-survive-a-pre-registered-multi-laboratory-replication-meeting-the-standard-set-in-the-1986-hyman-honorton-communique}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXOpen QuestionCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesEssays About This Entity (1 essay)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Open QuestionHyman and Honorton wrote down, jointly and in advance, what a decisive ganzfeld study would look like. No series run since has been accepted by both sides as meeting it. Two later meta-analyses, Milton and Wiseman in 1999 and Storm, Tressoldi and Di Risio in 2010, reach opposite conclusions on differently defined study pools, so the accumulated literature cannot settle it either.What would resolve this A pre-registered adversarial collaboration with laboratories on both sides of the dispute, an analysis plan agreed and lodged before data collection, and a commitment from all parties to publish whatever results.OpenExperimental psychology; meta-analysis; pre-registration methodologyRay Hyman, Charles Honorton, A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyCross-Tradition ConnectionsDiscipline NeededExperimental Psychology, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honortontier 1Meta-Analytic Methodology, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honortontier 1Pre-Registration Methodology, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honortontier 1Question OnThe Autoganzfeld Series, Studies Well-attested Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honortontier 1SourcesA Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversytier 1Ray Hyman, Charles Honorton, Journal of Parapsychology, Vol. 50, 1986Essays About This Entity (1 essay)Four Experiments Were Each Meant to Settle Something. None of Them DidThe open question itself, confirmed publicComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year