Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Open Questions

Which stone does the Hebrew leshem, rendered ligure in the King James Version, actually name?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Open Question

No securely dated ancient Hebrew source uses leshem outside the Exodus breastplate list in a context that fixes what stone it names, so every proposed identification, jacinth, amber, tourmaline or opal, rests on inference rather than direct attestation. The Septuagint, the Vulgate and the later translation tradition do not agree on a referent for this ninth breastplate stone either, which is the visible symptom of the unsettled identification.

What would resolve this An independently attested, securely dated use of leshem in a non-biblical ancient Hebrew or closely related Northwest Semitic inscription or document, ideally alongside a described or surviving physical object, would let philologists cross-check the word against a known referent. A securely provenanced, labeled exemplar from a Second Temple period priestly context would serve the same purpose.
OpenNorthwest Semitic philology, biblical archaeology and historical mineralogyAnonymous (multiple authors), The Holy Bible
Cross-Tradition Connections

Question On

Ligure, Gemstones
Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)
Sources
The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 1611View the Source
Antiquities of the Jews
Flavius Josephus, W. Bowyer (for the author), 1737View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.