Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Pantheons

Zoroastrian

Monotheistic Dualist Pantheons

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The deities of Zoroastrianism, arranged as a moral opposition rather than a family tree. Ahura Mazda, the wise lord, is the uncreated creator and wholly good; Angra Mainyu, the hostile spirit, stands against him with an existence and a destructive activity that is not derived from him. Around Ahura Mazda stand the Amesha Spentas, the bounteous immortals, and beneath them the yazatas, beings worthy of worship with deep Indo-Iranian roots, among them Mithra and Anahita. The type also records one of the sharper facts in comparative religion, that the daevas, cognate with the Sanskrit word for the gods, sit on the wrong side here, the divine class of one branch of a shared inheritance reversed into the demonic class of another.

Facts
Attestation
Era of Attestation
1200 BCE to 2026 CE 1
Era of Attestation
Attested from the Gathas, hymns attributed to Zoroaster and dated by most scholars to sometime between 1500 and 1000 BCE, through the Achaemenid, Parthian and Sasanian empires to the present. A living tradition practiced today by Zoroastrian communities in Iran and India. 1
Veneration Today
Actively venerated in a living tradition 1
Structure
Structure of the Pantheon
Two divine families or camps held in tension with each other 1
Divine Headship
A single sovereign god rules the others 1
Succession Between Divine Generations
One divine generation; no succession between generations is recorded 1
The Creator and the Ruling Gods
The creator of the world also rules the pantheon 1
Organisation
Membership of the Pantheon
The roster is fixed by a written canon 1
How Mortals Enter the Pantheon
No recognised route from mortal to god 1
Cult
Principal Cult Centre
The Atash Behram fires, chief among them at Udvada in Gujarat and at Yazd 1
Sources
Primary Source
The Avesta, chiefly the Gathas and the Yashts, with the Pahlavi Bundahishn 1
Learn More
The Shape of the Zoroastrian Pantheon

Zoroastrian divinity is arranged as an opposition, and the opposition is moral rather than genealogical. Ahura Mazda, the wise lord, is the creator and the ruler, uncreated and wholly good. Against him stands the hostile spirit, Angra Mainyu, whose existence is not derived from him and whose activity is destruction. The world is the field on which that conflict is worked out and is expected to end.

Around Ahura Mazda stand the Amesha Spentas, the bounteous immortals, six figures who are at once persons and qualities, good purpose, best truth, desirable dominion, holy devotion, wholeness and immortality, each associated with a part of the good creation. Below them the yazatas, beings worthy of worship, include figures with deep Indo-Iranian roots such as Mithra and Anahita.

There is no succession here, because there are no generations. Ahura Mazda does not have a father he displaced, and the Amesha Spentas are brought into being by him rather than born. A pantheon organised as a single creative act rather than as a family history is rare, and it is one of the sharpest contrasts the atlas can draw with the Greek or the Hittite arrangement.

The daevas, whose name is cognate with the Sanskrit word for the gods, are on the wrong side. That reversal, in which the divine class of one branch of a shared inheritance becomes the demonic class of another, is one of the most striking facts in comparative religion.

How the Zoroastrian Tradition Reaches Us

The Avesta that survives is a fragment of what once existed, and the tradition itself says so. Later Zoroastrian literature describes a much larger collection in many books, of which what remains is the liturgical core, preserved because it was recited.

Within it the Gathas stand apart. They are in an older dialect, they are metrically distinct, and they are attributed to Zarathushtra himself. They are also extremely difficult: the language is archaic, the poetry is compressed, and translations diverge to a degree that has real consequences for what the religion is taken to have originally taught.

The Avestan texts were transmitted orally for a very long time before an alphabet was devised specifically to record their sounds, and the manuscripts that carry them are comparatively recent. Priestly transmission preserved pronunciation with great fidelity across centuries in which understanding of the language itself was fading.

The Middle Persian literature of the ninth century and after, the Bundahishn among it, supplies systematic cosmology and law. It is invaluable and it is late, written under Islamic rule by a community defending and consolidating itself, and it should not be read straight back onto the Gathas.

Outside sources add a further layer: Greek and Roman writers on the magi, Achaemenid royal inscriptions that invoke Ahura Mazda without mentioning Zarathushtra, and the practice of the living community in Iran and among the Parsis of India.

Correspondences & Relations

Pantheon Members

Pantheon Of

Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.